![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I played around some more with FS2004 last night. The ATC is much
improved, and you can now see approach plates in the GPS moving map display. However the approach plates are not complete. For example, the approaches to LAX do not have all of the legs of the approaches shown in the plates, and some are absent. Instead of the names that they have on the plates, they are named by the first waypoint. For instance, the Northeast approach to LAX is FIM, and begins at the FIM waypoint. This is a minor quibble, there are enough wayponts for a realistic approach; but one should get the plates if one wants to practice the whole approach thing like in the real world. The online documentation does a pretty good job of explaining how to use the GPS and the approaches, but newbies may find it tough sledding and should consider learning about approaches from another book before delving into this. You can call up the approaches fromthe GPS, where the legs are displayed on the moving map (you need good eyes, it is small and you can't scroll the moving map). You can add the approach to your flight plan before takeoff or on the fly, but here it gets a bit confusing if you are using the autopilot. If you use the GPS to follow your flight plan, you have to manually shift to the approach at some (any) time during flight, and if you are using the autopilot, you have to remember to change the autopilot from "nav" to "heading", otherwise it will not follow the approach. The GPS will not land you, so if you want to follow the glideslope in, you have to switch back to "apr", change the switch from "GPS" to "CDI" (or whatever). In the meantime the runway frequency has not been entered automatically into the CDI, so you have to do that manually (If you are using ATC, that can be done automatically in the usual manner by acknowledging the ATC instructions - but I am not sure if the ATC will or will not follow your flight plan-probably not). It is also unclear to me that if one is flying autopilot (not GPS) and adds the approach to the flight plan, will the autopilot follow the approach by itself when it reaches that point, or does one have to do it manually? The easy way would be if the autopilot just keeps following the waypoints added to the flight plan, then all one has to do is to press the "apr" button at some point to lock on to the glideslope (after adjusting the correct frequencies and bearing). The above should make it clear why correctly flying IFR requires years of training... The ATC is improved, but has at least one of the irritating bugs of FS2002, namely the multiple handing off back and forth between the same two controllers after takeoff. Anyway now the ATC will vector you around your destination in a ralistic way, and there are additions like the ability to request a different runway or a different altitude. To get around the unrealistic idea of having a moving map GPS display in the Spirit of St louis, there are two versions of the Garmin, the normal one and the handheld one, for use in older aircraft. So if you are so inclined you could fly Lindberg's flight to Paris with the help of a handheld GPS device. Holy mackeral! I never realizd that the top speed of the Piper Cub was a measly 85 mph! That's slower than a car, and it could be embarrasing to fly a Cub along an autobahn in Germany with cars zipping by... What is missing in FS2004? Well, the 3D scenery is still inferior in accuracy to some addons for FS2002, and I am sure that updates of these programs like the one that has true altitudes for North america (forgot the name) will have FS2004 versions out soon. The panel for the heavy metal is still the same generic one, which doesn't bother me too much (I bought the detailed 747 and 767 ones for FS2002 (forgot the name again), but found them too complex and didn't use them much. For modern planes there are no new ones that were not in the FS2002 Pro package; seems to me thay could have added at least one medium size short-haul commercial turbojet. As far as I could detemine, there is no tutorial for using approach plates. Perhaps it was considered that this would be too complex and is better learned from a book. The excellent addon FS2000 book by the guy with the Chinese name (forgot the title-sorry) or the thick Flight Simulator 2000 Handbook can be used for that. There are also good tutorial sites on the web, but I have forgotten their names also. Henri |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Closest SDF, LDA and LOC-BC Approaches | Andrew Sarangan | Instrument Flight Rules | 17 | June 5th 04 03:06 PM |
Where is approach good about multiple approaches and clearances in the air? | Andrew Gideon | Instrument Flight Rules | 29 | February 14th 04 02:51 AM |
Bridges in FS2004 | Kevin Reilly | Simulators | 18 | October 2nd 03 11:00 PM |
Logging instrument approaches | Slav Inger | Instrument Flight Rules | 33 | July 27th 03 11:00 PM |
Garmin Behind the Curve on WAAS GPS VNAV Approaches | Richard Kaplan | Instrument Flight Rules | 24 | July 18th 03 01:43 PM |