![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
At 23:24 30 July 2003, Rjciii wrote:
Judy, Can the SSA provide any help with respect to advocacy in this situation other than provide regulatory references? SSA's Airport Utilization group headed by Steve Northcraft can provide some assistance in airport user issues, but FAR 16.23 limits the role any association can play here. The person or entity directly and substantially affected by an airport authority's alleged act or omission has the legal standing to file a formal complaint with FAA and bears primary responsibility to document the resulting detriment to safety, economics and/or efficiency. That said, it's been my experience that many airport utilization issues tend to involve glider pilots saying, 'we've always done things this way' while the airport manager, his/her supervising Commission, the City/County Board and/or the local FSDO or ADO point to FAA advisory material and say, 'well, you're in conflict with FAA safety standards.' True enough, the origins of some of these conflicts can be traced to a cranky airport tenant or an airport manager with an anti-soaring bent. More insidious and perhaps more often, planned airport improvements - and the desire for federal funding to pay for them - can prompt a review of airport procedures and the (unpleasant) finding that glider ops need to be modified. Chief among the sticky wickets for soaring: design standards for Obstacle Free Zones and Object Free Areas, along with recommended procedures for ground personnel and vehicles on aprons/ramps, taxi ways and runways. These issues have been dealt with at Minden Tahoe (Douglas County) airport in NV and their current operating rules are available online through the 'regulations' link at http://mtairport.co.douglas.nv.us/pilot_guide.html# (be sure to check out not only the glider ops section but also rules pertaining to pedestrians and vehicles!) The intersection traffic cop is a novel and unprecedented idea, as far as I know... but given the LGC runway layout shown on Airnav and blind ends of the intersecting runways, it would not IMHO seem unreasonable for airport operating rules to require either radios in all gliders or (1) a launch announcement by a radio-equipped tow plane and (2) normal glider landings stopping well short of the intersecting runway. Finally, I note that in a previous post, you mention that gliders are not allowed to operate from the runway with an instrument approach, which is cited on Airnav as an ILS on 31. Presumably this is used in IMC and for practice approaches in VMC. Meanwhile, Soaring Eagles' website mentions (occasional?) winch launch activities apparently taking place on 03/21. Hmmm... maybe an intersection traffic cop isn't such a bad idea when the winch is in use. Judy |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Sport Pilot - School Won't Offer | Gary G | Piloting | 38 | February 16th 05 10:41 AM |
The Internet public meeting on National Air Tour Standards begins Feb. 23 at 9 a.m. | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 0 | February 22nd 04 03:58 PM |
"I Want To FLY!"-(Youth) My store to raise funds for flying lessons | Curtl33 | General Aviation | 7 | January 9th 04 11:35 PM |
God Honest | Naval Aviation | 2 | July 24th 03 04:45 AM |