![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
C'mon Mark, read and think before you blow up. The rule says "exit the
cylinder." You can't bump the start gaggles in the cylinder if you have exited the cylinder. And give the RC a little credit for intelligence. They've thought about this problem. I believe the precise rule the RC is working on insists on taking your last exit from the cylinder precisely to avoid traffic problems. They have thought about only allowing starts from the "front half" of the circle. I know they decided against "best fix in the start area" precisely to avoid this traffic problem. They have thought hard about it, and any rule they end up with will address this obvious problem. They're not dumb, you know. Here's the advantage of taking distance from the exit point. In the current system a single point is optimal -- the point of the circle closest to the first turn. This focuses traffic and gives rise to the huge pre start gaggle we all know and love. If you get credit for the extra distance that you achieve, starting say 1/4 of the way around the start circle, then you can avoid the huge gaggle with no penalty. You can also start directly from a good thermal, or start at the point closest to the cloudstreet out on course, without worrying about losing the 2-3 miles relative to the optimal point. How relaxing. It becomes just like starting from a line -- there is no single optimal point. Every start point is "just as close" to the first turn. Lots of people want a line for this reason -- Dave Mockler campaigned for RC precisely on this. With this little change you get all the benefits of starting on a line, and none of the disadvantages: everyone is within 5 miles of the home airport, and there is no upwind end. This change also reduces the amount of calculation and figuring you have to do. With the current rule, the optimal start point also depends on wind. I know the secret formula for that, do you? If the last thermal is far from the optimal point, you have to figure out whether it's better to glide to the front of the circle, losing altitude, or leave where you are, losing distance. I know that formula too. Do you? All of this disappears in this nice new idea. If something is better, why in the world tie yourself to not using it for 3 years? I notice few pilots insisting on 3 year moratoriums for new varios or new gliders! John Cochrane |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Turbine air start -- too cold? | Juan Jimenez | Home Built | 97 | March 14th 05 06:51 PM |
Rules on what can be in a hangar | Brett Justus | Owning | 13 | February 27th 04 05:35 PM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |
Best Software and Hardware for Turn Area Task? | Snead1 | Soaring | 29 | August 13th 03 04:12 PM |
Re-Engine B-52 proposal. (I love this debate) | CFA3 | Military Aviation | 17 | July 13th 03 08:53 PM |