![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Flew on Sunday in non-stable conditions. David Pixton flew his Ventus
2b at approx. 800 lbs, and I flew my Ventus 2bx at 1150 lbs. Because conditions were turbulent, we were unable to do any smooth air testing, but during the course of 10 pull ups (entry 100 knots, exit 60 knots) we observed the following: Wing abreast with about 100 to 150 feet of separation, pull ups were either even or slightly better (10 to 20 feet) for the heavier glider. Because we were following a cloud street, we were unsure whether the apparent parity was actual or lift related. Dave was selecting the path, so it is possible that he was better centered in the lift street. I repositioned directly behind Dave (less than 100 feet). With each pull I was forced to maneuver to avoid him, and would generally gain between 10 to 30 feet. On one pull however, I gained more than 50 additional feet. In each case, I was forced to deploy spoilers to get back into position for the next pull. It appeared that the stronger the core we pulled in, the more advantage I got. On a few occasions, Dave pulled to less than 60 knots, and while this cut down on my advantage, I regained it immediately (and then some) as we returned to cruising speed. It is interesting to note that during these tailored pull ups and during subsequent street running with freeform pulls, Dave never gained on me. I found myself making S turns to keep from overtaking him. When at last I took the lead, the overall advantage to the heavier glider was apparent and substantial. We'll try this again in still air, but initial results indicate that there is a marked difference in climb during each pull up. Even at a conservative 15 feet per pull, a hundered such pulls during a task would account for 1500 extra feet, and this doesn't include the advantages water offers during the cruising phase of flight. So to answer the question, "is there a difference?" the answer is yes... in theory and in practice. Dave commented after the flight, "I need to get back into the habit of putting water in the wings." If I can muster Dave for some early moring flying, we'll get some more quantitative results. OC |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Parachute fails to save SR-22 | Capt.Doug | Piloting | 72 | February 10th 05 05:14 AM |
Pressure Altitude and Terminology | Icebound | Piloting | 0 | November 27th 04 09:14 PM |
What's minimum safe O2 level? | PaulH | Piloting | 29 | November 9th 04 07:35 PM |
GPS Altitude with WAAS | Phil Verghese | Piloting | 38 | October 5th 03 12:39 AM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |