A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Altitude gain: qualitative analysis



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1  
Old September 29th 03, 01:10 PM
Chris OCallaghan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Altitude gain: qualitative analysis

Flew on Sunday in non-stable conditions. David Pixton flew his Ventus
2b at approx. 800 lbs, and I flew my Ventus 2bx at 1150 lbs. Because
conditions were turbulent, we were unable to do any smooth air
testing, but during the course of 10 pull ups (entry 100 knots, exit
60 knots) we observed the following:

Wing abreast with about 100 to 150 feet of separation, pull ups were
either even or slightly better (10 to 20 feet) for the heavier glider.
Because we were following a cloud street, we were unsure whether the
apparent parity was actual or lift related. Dave was selecting the
path, so it is possible that he was better centered in the lift
street.

I repositioned directly behind Dave (less than 100 feet). With each
pull I was forced to maneuver to avoid him, and would generally gain
between 10 to 30 feet. On one pull however, I gained more than 50
additional feet. In each case, I was forced to deploy spoilers to get
back into position for the next pull. It appeared that the stronger
the core we pulled in, the more advantage I got. On a few occasions,
Dave pulled to less than 60 knots, and while this cut down on my
advantage, I regained it immediately (and then some) as we returned to
cruising speed.

It is interesting to note that during these tailored pull ups and
during subsequent street running with freeform pulls, Dave never
gained on me. I found myself making S turns to keep from overtaking
him. When at last I took the lead, the overall advantage to the
heavier glider was apparent and substantial.

We'll try this again in still air, but initial results indicate that
there is a marked difference in climb during each pull up. Even at a
conservative 15 feet per pull, a hundered such pulls during a task
would account for 1500 extra feet, and this doesn't include the
advantages water offers during the cruising phase of flight.

So to answer the question, "is there a difference?" the answer is
yes... in theory and in practice. Dave commented after the flight, "I
need to get back into the habit of putting water in the wings."

If I can muster Dave for some early moring flying, we'll get some more
quantitative results.

OC
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Parachute fails to save SR-22 Capt.Doug Piloting 72 February 10th 05 05:14 AM
Pressure Altitude and Terminology Icebound Piloting 0 November 27th 04 09:14 PM
What's minimum safe O2 level? PaulH Piloting 29 November 9th 04 07:35 PM
GPS Altitude with WAAS Phil Verghese Piloting 38 October 5th 03 12:39 AM
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools RT Military Aviation 104 September 25th 03 03:17 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:22 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.