![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Martin Hellman" wrote in message Snip a lot of good stuff________________ There was an interesting article in Soaring Magazine about a year ago which talked about related issues. Sorry I don't have the date, but if memory serves me it's by a Biz School prof from Chicago. He argued that you should use a lower setting when close to the ground because you have less time to find a thermal and will almost surely have to settle for a weaker one. Once you're high, you have more time to be picky and can use a setting close to or even equal to the maximal thermal strength of the day. Snip some more good stuff_____________________ The prof is John Cochrane and his articles are he http://www-gsb.uchicago.edu/fac/john...s/soaring.html I like his point that the M value is basically an optimism setting. If you are optimistic about your situation and the weather ahead, set a high M value. If you are less optimistic, set a lower M value. That pretty much takes care of all situations. Bill Daniels |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Reno Air Races -- 2600 Miles in 2 Days! | Jay Honeck | Piloting | 88 | September 25th 04 03:48 PM |
Crossing the Rocky Mountains | RD | Piloting | 16 | January 9th 04 09:15 PM |
Across Nevada and Part Way Back (long) | Marry Daniel or David Grah | Soaring | 18 | July 30th 03 08:52 PM |