![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[snip]
IANAL, but violation of an FAR would seem to fit the case of neglience, hardly a cause for denial of coverage for the incident in question. It might play in denial of future coverage. Frank, I think this issue came up in the Seventies when some aviation insurers were trying to deny claims based on FAR violations, and there was some sort of gubmint action to put a stop to that. The way the FARs are written, essentially anything that happens to an aircraft can be traced to either an FAR violation or an "act of God" -- so a policy that excluded both would never pay on anything! The insurance industry is heavily regulated and laws specifically govern their operation. Part of the law is called "bad faith". It essentially means that an insurance company is guilty of bad faith if they issued it without any intention of paying the claim. If the courts find them guilty of bad faith the insured is entitled to treble (triple) damages. Read your policy; if there is no clause concerning violation of FARs then it doesn't apply. Some policies do have exclusions for illegal acts, such as malpractice insurance. My own experience in processing claims on my glider insurance has been positive. They are interested in closing (i.e. paying) claims as soon as possible (I think that claims that stay open for long periods attract attention). This can be an issue with gliders since repairs can take a LONG period of time (remember this when you consider trying to make a marginal glide over bad territory-bone heal even more slowly). They only issue I had was they wanted me to take my motorglider to a local A/P because the claim was related to the engine extension mechanism. I insisted that only the DG dealer was qualified to do the repair (which, in fact, was the case). I got my way. Translation: insurance companies can't force a claim resolution down your throat that you disagree with. Example: having a boat repair shop do glass repair on your glider. Of course, these are U.S. laws. I have no idea what goes on in other countries. Tom |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
IVO pireps wanted.. high performance/high speed... | Dave S | Home Built | 8 | June 2nd 04 04:12 PM |
SWRFI Pirep.. (long) | Dave S | Home Built | 20 | May 21st 04 03:02 PM |
SWRFI Pirep.. (long) | Dave S | Piloting | 19 | May 21st 04 03:02 PM |
500 foot rule and pilot opinion poll | John Cochrane | Soaring | 84 | October 2nd 03 02:13 PM |
Defining Composites (long) | B Lacovara | Soaring | 1 | September 13th 03 08:04 PM |