Date of effect now 1 April 2004 for revised IGC-approval for certain legacy types of GNSS flight recorder

John, you are completely right. But i do not htink that that is the real
issue.

I ask myself, why this increase in security? What is the reason? How
many cases of cheating or falsifying document has been revealed?

Why increase the security level just because things has deloped over the
years? Suppose that what was decided in 1994 was "overkill" and still is
good enough?

What really is annoying is that our own world organization is now using
the same arguments as our CAA:s and airspace authorities are using when
increasing controlled airspace and making transponders etc mandatory.

This is not just a case of security for loggers, this is a case of bad
thinking and bad philosophy by our elected leaders.

Robert


John Galloway wrote:
At 20:36 26 November 2003, Pat Russell wrote:

What if: a pilot who already holds a world record
uses the same
flight recorder on a flight that beats the old record.
He
submits his claim, gets a new national record, but
is not
allowed to claim a new world record because the flight
recorder
was downgraded in the meantime.

This is not a matter of 'interpretation,' nor has it
ever
existed before. It is merely bizarre.


Pat,

I don't see that as bizarre at all. In any sport equipment
approvals can be changed so that what was OK last year
is not this year. It would be truly bizarre if this
could not be the case.

I find it hard to imagine that anyone in the position
to be going for a world record would be unable to fix
him or herself up with an approved logger for the flight
one way or another.

John Galloway