A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Speed Astir II B



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #4  
Old December 10th 03, 02:59 PM
Wallace Berry
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
(Flyhighdave) wrote:

In my case "novice" means about 20 training flights & a few solo flights in a
Grob 103 II A. I guess I'm really just a beginner!
David


Since no one so far has offered much in the way of a flight report on
the Speed (dis)Aster. I'll tell you what I remember from my two flights.

Thing is built like a tank. Heavy wings. Maybe heavier than LS-3 wings.
Typical Grob pain-in-the-ass assembly problems. Maybe not too much of a
problem once you get the hang of fitting it all together. Did I mention
that the wings are heavy? I have not flown a PIK-20, but I get the
impression that the PIK and the Grob are somewhat similar in handling
and performance.

Cockpit is long but narrow at the hips due to the control system tunnels
on each side. Sorta pinched my 195 lb butt a little. Otherwise, it was
comfortable to fly.

I thought the Speed that I flew handled pretty well. Lots more stable
than my 301 Libelle. Controls not heavy and not too light. Negative
flaps resulted in rapid acceleration. Both my flights in the Speed were
on very weak lift days, but it seemed to thermal OK for a heavy ship.
Probably not a bad ship on strong days. However, I've been told that the
stiff wings, and they are very stiff, hinder it's performance in rough
air for some reason. Glide path control was pretty typical for a glass
ship. I seem to remember that the divebrakes were not quite as effective
as on the103.

Other stuff:

Grob finish usually holds up better than most.

The two piece canopy is OK except for a couple of annoyances. One is
that if left open, it tends to focus sunlight on the headrest which can
set the glider on fire. Two is that the fixed forward part of the canopy
makes it hard to work on the instruments or work on anything up in the
nose.

The tail dolly is a wheel on a post. It fits up into a hole in the
bottom of the tail boom. Falls off all by itself when the tail is
lifted. This is a good thing if you forget to remove the tail dolly
before flight. Take if from one who knows, leaving the tail dolly on
makes for an interesting start to the ground roll.

Wing skins form the hinge for the wing control surfaces. No mylar needed.

My personal choice was to go for a lighter glider that was easier to
assembly and performed better in weak conditions. The Speed would be
pretty far down my list of preferences. But, for the right price, it
would be an OK ship.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Landing and T/O distances (Was Cold War ALternate Basing) Guy Alcala Military Aviation 3 August 13th 04 12:18 PM
Va and turbulent air penetration speed. Doug Instrument Flight Rules 70 January 11th 04 08:35 PM
Va and turbulent air penetration speed. Doug Owning 69 January 11th 04 08:35 PM
Problem: Ground Speed Estimate with Volkslogger and WinPilot RamyYanetz Soaring 3 August 26th 03 03:06 PM
New Film: The Need For Speed - Going to war on drugs Phil Carpenter Military Aviation 0 July 23rd 03 07:43 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:17 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.