![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Ian Strachan" wrote in message ... In article u, Swiftel Snip----- It is interesting that when Gerhard Weibal lectured at the BGA weekend about 5 years ago, he naturally concentrated on huge-span sailplanes. I therefore asked him in the question period what he considered the most "cost-effective span". I expected him to say about 20 or 22 metres but his reply was 17. Pretty close to the 16m I mentioned above, and fortunately also to 18m which is now a separate IGC class and is particularly suited to bearing the extra weight of a motor (whereas 15m is a tad small for a self-launcher in a weak-thermal country). Snip----- Ian Strachan Bentworth Hall West Tel: +44 1420 564 195 Bentworth, Alton Fax: +44 1420 563 140 Hampshire GU34 5LA, ENGLAND Interesting. I recall a technical discussion a long time ago asking whether there was a "natural best wingspan" imposed by the nature of soaring weather. The question was this: "Ignoring competition classes, is there a single best wingspan that is suited for the widest range of soaring conditions? The answers converged around 18 meters. Larger spans were considered too slow in strong conditions and smaller spans suffered in weak conditions. It's interesting that the "most cost effective wingspan" is about the same. This makes me wonder if eventually the 18 meter class will become dominant. It also makes me wonder if the selection of 15 meters for the two most popular classes was an error. Bill Daniels |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
sailplanes for sale | Jerry Marshall | Soaring | 1 | October 21st 03 03:51 AM |