Spinning (mis)concepts

At 02:54 31 January 2004, Adp wrote:

Except it isnt is it! Gliders require you to understand
fully things like adverse yaw, energy management, not
being able to power-on and go around. When you land
a glider, you only get one shot at it, what ever the
conditions happen to be thrown at you. How much time
do you spend thinking of where you are going to land
out when you are at 1500 feet above the ground in
your power plane? It has nothing what ever to do with
irrational prejudice.

This is one of the biggest nonsense myths in the soaring
community. It
amounts to an irrational prejudice towards power pilots
who transition to
gliders.
There is considerably greater difference between, say,
flying a Bonanza and
flying a Boeing 757 than flying any glider.
Gliders are incredibly easy to fly. Simply be aware
of the differences.
It really amounts to attitude. (In both senses of
the word.)
When flying a Bonanza, think Bonanza. When flying
a King Air, think King
Air. When flying a B-757, think 757. When flying
a F18, think F18. When
flying a glider, think glider. When flying a motor
glider, think glider.
It can't be much simpler.

Allan

'Mark James Boyd' wrote in message
news:401acc7c$1@darkstar...
Pete Zeugma wrote:

Ah, power planes, not gliders! Do you not think perhaps
we should be differentiating between rudder usage
in
power plane, and a glider? I started flying originally
in gliders, so I dont have any bad habits from power
flying, and when I fly powered aircraft, i cant help
but fly coordinated all the time. I know that power
pilots who make the transition to gliders quite often
make fundemental errors due to the power mindset when
sat in a glider. What do you think?

Absolutely there are subtle differences that get overlooked.
Primacy is a factor here. Use of spoilers, wheel
brake
not at the feet, no stall horn, can't use throttle
to
descend, actually seeing adverse yaw, etc. All these
were probably much harder to learn (unlearn) than
if
one started as a glider pilot first.

....Snip....