|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#27
April 27th 04, 08:59 PM
|
|||
|
|||
On Tue, 27 Apr 2004 12:07:37 -0700, Eric Greenwell
wrote: Bill Daniels wrote: ..../.... The 35 pounds or so the BRS adds to the non-flying part of the glider bothers me too. It would likely reduce the allowable cockpit load. Surely, as the BRS would be installed on or just behind the CG, it would be more like carrying a turbo in that the cockpit load would remain as before but the permitted amount of water ballast would be decreased. -- martin@ : Martin Gregorie gregorie : Harlow, UK demon : co : Zappa fan & glider pilot uk : 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| A Question For Real Airline Pilots | Blue | Simulators | 34 | September 6th 04 01:55 AM |
| I thought some of these are classics | goneill | Soaring | 0 | April 8th 04 10:51 AM |
| Rumsfeld is an even bigger asshole than I thought | noname | Military Aviation | 0 | March 20th 04 03:48 AM |
| And you thought aviation reporting was bad! | C J Campbell | Piloting | 14 | February 17th 04 02:41 AM |
| About the book entitled: Test Pilot, 1001 things you thought you knew about aviation | Koopas Ly | Piloting | 1 | December 2nd 03 02:54 AM |
Threaded Mode