![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Not really. For allmost every turbo equipped glider the max. total weight is
the same as the one for the pure glider, and in some cases the turbo has one even lower. The discus 1 for example has a MTOW of 525 kg without the engine, but with the turbo it reduced to 450 kg. Roelant van der Bos I simplified it a bit too much, perhaps. It would come out of the "non-lifting parts" limit (basically the fuselage and everything in it). Generally, the effect would be to reduce the cockpit allowed load, but not always, depending on the exact weight of fuselage and installed equipment. The amount of water ballast allowed would not likely change, since it is carried by the wing (a lifting part), not the fuselage. A glider designed to carry a motor will have a higher "non-lifting parts" limit (perhaps from more structure, stronger lift pins, etc) than a similar non-motorized one, in order to preserve the cockpit load. Thanks for the explanation. -- martin@ : Martin Gregorie gregorie : Harlow, UK demon : co : Zappa fan & glider pilot uk : |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
A Question For Real Airline Pilots | Blue | Simulators | 34 | September 6th 04 01:55 AM |
I thought some of these are classics | goneill | Soaring | 0 | April 8th 04 10:51 AM |
Rumsfeld is an even bigger asshole than I thought | noname | Military Aviation | 0 | March 20th 04 03:48 AM |
And you thought aviation reporting was bad! | C J Campbell | Piloting | 14 | February 17th 04 02:41 AM |
About the book entitled: Test Pilot, 1001 things you thought you knew about aviation | Koopas Ly | Piloting | 1 | December 2nd 03 02:54 AM |