![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tony Burton wrote:
The drafters of the Canadian COTS proposal to the last IGC meeting and the Canadian IGC delgate have been in constant contact recently with Garmin and the IGC GFAC committee to resolve technical/rules mismatches. It appears that these are being sorted out for a popular Garmin unit now that the engineers and the GFAC committee learned to speak each other's language. :-) This is news to me, which should be a little bit surprising, given that I am one of the members of GFAC. I know of the Canadian COTS proposal, but have heard nothing about it since it was rejected by the IGC. There is reason to be optomistic that a COTS GPS unit will be approved within a bureaucratically short period of time. If by "bureaucratically short period of time" you mean October 2006, then indeed, there is some finite probability that something could happen then. IGC rule-making procedures make it impossible for it to happen any sooner. Marc |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
us air force us air force academy us air force bases air force museum us us air force rank us air force reserve adfunk | Jehad Internet | Military Aviation | 0 | February 7th 04 04:24 AM |