![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I agree with you Karel.
This is surely a leftover from ancient days. We skipped that rule for our National redcords and our "Nattional OLC" (which, BTW, has been running since 1945) many years ago. At least you can say that there was a purpose in the old days because it wsa a sport in itself to find two tutnpoints close together but still 10 km apart. Not so easy to find in a forrested country like Sweden. Today with the GPS loggers you can calculate 2 TP:s with that are exactly 10 km apart........ so there is no sport in it any more. KISS!!! When Ray Lynskey flew the first 2000K flight it was not recognized as a world record, so consequently the SC was changed the following year to allow 3 TP courses. Ronalds flight is quite an achievement so why not use it as an argument for a proposal to the IGC for the 2005 meeting? We will support it! Robert Danewid Sweden K.P. Termaat wrote: Hello Ian, Thanks for your extensive reply. Quite happy with that. I have sent you a personal reply with some more details. For the discussion on ras let me reply in short again. The OO ruined a 1000 km FAI badge just a week ago being unaware of the 10 km FAI requirement. Or may be FAI did that. The flight in question was: Starting point ST 1st turnpoint A (leg of 99 km to the NE) 2nd turnpoint B (leg of 403 km to the S) 3rd turnpoint A (leg of 403 km to the N) Finishpoint FP (leg of 99 km to the SW) So a distance flight using up to three turnpoints. Total length 1004.3 km. An excellent performance flown one would say. Not to FAI however. FAI considers the return to A as a "jojo" after having flown more then 800 km to and back from B. So no 1000 km FAI badge. Of course the flight fullfils our national rules for a 1-3 tp free flight and the pilot will receive a 1000 km badge from our National Gliding Organisation for his outstanding performance. To prevent "jojo-ing" between two waypoints of a 1-3 tp flight we have in our national rule the simple statement "Each visit to a turnpoint increases the number by one". Prevents "jojo-ing" and does not destroy an excellent performance as the one described. Of cource the popular OLC recognises this flight also. Maximises the distance flown to 1012.2 km using 4 turnpoints (see OLC site). Best regards Karel NL "Ian Strachan" schreef in bericht ... In article , K.P. Termaat writes For a distance flight using up to three turn points the Sporting Code says at 1.4.5.b. : "The turn points must be at least 10 kilometers apart and may be claimed once, etc." Why "10 km", why "once". Does anybody know. It was an arbitrary distance decided on by Tor Johannessen when he was in charge of Sporting Code rules some years ago. The intention was to prevent repeat use of a particular turn point. I was Sporting Code editor (under Tor) at that time and argued against it, but did not prevail. After all, it is for a distance rather than a goal flight and I would have though that if the required distance can be proved, that should be sufficient. And even for a goal flight, what is wrong with a repeat turn point as long as it is in the pre-flight declaration and the geometry of the course is correct for the type of flight concerned? However, I think that it is right that some rule prevents the use of lots of repeat legs, or even lots of legs, in wave or ridge lift. That was the purpose of the "up to three turn points". Any figure, 10km or other, is arbitrary. A slight error, say 9.9 km would lead to the whole flight being rejected whereas 10.1 km would be OK. As you say, Karel, "why?" Particularly now that free (no pre-flight turn point declaration) flying for various distance records is allowed, perhaps the whole matter of distance and goal definitions should be looked at again by IGC. For instance, where "distance" is the criteria rather than "goal", why do not free flight rules apply? And for free flights where waypoints can be selected by the pilot after flight, why is a pre-flight declaration needed at all? Just a couple of "stones into the millpond" ......... -- Ian Strachan Lasham Gliding Centre, UK Bentworth Hall West Tel: +44 1420 564 195 Bentworth, Alton Fax: +44 1420 563 140 Hampshire GU34 5LA, ENGLAND |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|