A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Altitude loss for 5h Duration Flight



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1  
Old August 23rd 04, 04:35 PM
nyffeler
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Altitude loss for 5h Duration Flight


Kathrin, she got her licence last year, made a flight of total 5h 14min.

Take off and landing was on Saanen (Switzerland) at 1029m.
Release Altitude was at 13:16 on 2112m, which is a normal release altitude for
Saanen.
Last point logged above release altitude - 1000m was at 18:23 on 1117m.
This gives a duration of 5:07h.

I thought this is ok for the silver badge duration flight and signed the claim
form.

You may imagine how frustrated she was as the NAC refused to accept the flight
for the reason according:
SC3 4.4.2 Loss of height and application of the height penalty
c. For speed and duration flights, a loss of height exceeding 1000 meters will
invalidate the soaring performance.

My question, is this decision really in terms of the sporting code?

Ok, the definitions a
DURATION 1.2.6 The time elapsed between the START TIME and the FINISH TIME.
FINISH TIME 1.2.4 The time that the SOARING PERFORMANCE finishes.
SOARING PERFORMANCE 1.1.1 The performance during that portion of a glider
flight from the START POINT to the FINISH POINT.
FINISH POINT 1.1.12 The WAY POINT marking the end of a SOARING PERFORMANCE. It
is:
a. The point at which the nose of the glider comes to rest without external
assistance after landing, or
b. A WAY POINT declared as the FINISH POINT or goal, or
c. The midpoint of a FINISH LINE, or
d. The point at which an MoP is started.

So the decision of the NAC was ok, because the altitude loss between release
and landing was 1083m, 83m to much.
However, if she would have started an MoP just bevor crossing the 1000m limit
the flight must have been accepted.

Is this not stupid?

Peter Nyffeler
(OO soaring club zurich)
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Aerobatics 28 January 2nd 09 02:26 PM
Pressure Altitude and Terminology Icebound Piloting 0 November 27th 04 09:14 PM
What's minimum safe O2 level? PaulH Piloting 29 November 9th 04 07:35 PM
GPS Altitude with WAAS Phil Verghese Piloting 38 October 5th 03 12:39 AM
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Piloting 25 September 11th 03 01:27 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:01 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.