![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It's starting to get a little gray now, to summarize...
If u declare a Start Point...one can either use release or Start Point for initial altitude for penalty caluculation. And then you can compare this against altitude at Finish Point observation sector? At 12:54 30 August 2004, Dale Kramer wrote: Marc, I can verify that this interpretation is correct. In 1999, I used this interpretation and received my 1000km. It was not easy to obtain with this interpretation and it took many months of perseverance. I believe I was the first to do this and I don't think they were happy about my insistence on this literal interpretation of the rule. It would be interesting to know if anyone else has successfully used it. I took off at Ridge Soaring with Altoona declared as a start and finish. Three turnpoints were declared between and then landed at Ridge Soaring. I got in wave on my way to Altoona and decided to fly down to Cumberland for fun before I started. I was in wave when I started at Altoona. I was able to use my tow release as my start altitude and my finish altitude at Altoona for the 1000m calculation. Dale Kramer K1 Marc Ramsey wrote in message news:... Denis wrote: Stewart Kissel wrote: Ok, this helps clear up an issue that has been bugging me. I would be interested in anyone who could verify/comment on whether a tow release could be used for a start...If a Start Point had been declared. No, it cannot (except reverting to a *free record* performance) SC3 1.4.5.b says that distance using up to three turnpoints is 'A flight from a START POINT via up to three TURN POINTS to a FINISH POINT.' Note that is says 'a START POINT', not 'the START POINT'. SC3 1.1.8 says a START POINT is either '(a) The RELEASE POINT, or (b) A WAY POINT declared as a START POINT, or (c) The midpoint of a START LINE.' Note that the pilot or data analyst can apparently choose between (b) and (c) after the flight, as I've never seen a declaration form (paper or electronic) that requires that you declare before the flight that you are using a start line as opposed to a start way point (with OZ). Being a computer programmer, I'd argue that the 'or' in clause (a) has the same logical precedence as the 'or' in clause (b). Therefore, if you have declared a start, it still seems to me that it would be valid to use any of the START POINT options, including the RELEASE POINT. Have you found a rule someplace else that would render this interpretation incorrect? Marc |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Run up for plug clearing | Roger Long | Piloting | 78 | October 18th 04 03:39 AM |
ramifications of new TSA rules on all non-US and US citizen pilots | paul k. sanchez | Piloting | 19 | September 27th 04 11:49 PM |
For Keith Willshaw... | robert arndt | Military Aviation | 253 | July 6th 04 05:18 AM |
Ultralight Club Bylaws - Warning Long Post | MrHabilis | Home Built | 0 | June 11th 04 05:07 PM |
Winch Experts wanted | Ulrich Neumann | Soaring | 117 | April 5th 04 06:52 AM |