![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have owned a Cambridge Model 20 flight recorder for several years
now. I have kept up with all the software upgrades to ensure it has the maximum features and functionality. None of these upgrades fixed some serious flaws in the software design, which I was not told about when I bought the unit. I am not exactly sure of the total facts and sequence of events, but the following describes a pretty sorry state of affairs… Late last year (2003), the IGC in its wisdom, demoted this and other types/models of Flight Recorder from "full" to badges and diplomas only. This unilateral decision was met with an outcry from around the world. The IGC then withdrew this decision, reconsidered it and then repeated that decision in early 2004 with a clear statement that the Model 20 (amongst others) would have its approval level reduced on 1 Oct 2004. On this basis and recognising the generous grandfathering of rights, I decided to buy a new Flight Recorder. Recently, I have been advised that this decision has been changed again. Three things annoy me he Firstly that the IGC cannot make up its mind - there have now been so many U-turns that I am getting dizzy! Secondly that this notice has been made in a back-handed way, contained right at the bottom of an advisory notice about a review of the process to look at the way Flight Recorders approvals are appraised. I have looked on the manufacturers website and there is no information. Apparently one has to subscribe to an IGC discussion forum (exciting stuff!) to have received this notice, and have taken the trouble to read through a whole document to get the nitty-gritty details at the end. Thirdly the wording of the statements is very unclear and could be regarded as ambiguous. Even now, I am not entirely sure of the approval levels. I am left questioning the competence of bureaucracy...... Humphrey |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Cambridge Instruments | Ian McPhee | Soaring | 2 | June 18th 04 10:14 AM |
Cambridge Aero Explorer Fix | Guy Byars | Soaring | 8 | May 19th 04 03:04 AM |
Cambridge Aero status? | Jamey Jacobs | Soaring | 3 | November 11th 03 02:54 AM |
Updated IGC approval documents for Cambridge GNSS flight recorders | Ian Strachan | Soaring | 0 | August 27th 03 05:28 PM |
Cambridge Aero Instruments | Ulrich | Soaring | 6 | August 7th 03 05:48 PM |