![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
One wishes that the SSA learned from its mistakes.
Under the old regime, there was little communication between the management and the members, and little effort was made to exploit the expertise of the membership. As a result, we got messes like the computer system. Now, the SSA decides to change its web page, and apparently made the decision to go for flash rather than functionality. Was that a good move? Perhaps -- maybe these days no one will look at a webpage unless there is a lot of moving stuff. However, it does appear that the decision was made without much (if any) input from the members. I used to look at the SSA webpage daily, but now almost never do. And I disagree with Chris in one respect -- I don't think the new webpage has a more graphically pleasing front end. It has a nice glider photo, but otherwise it is not attractive. And the scrolling ads are hideous. I wish the new SSA management well, but why can't they ask for the input and help of the membership? Chris OCallaghan wrote: Yes, disaster is too harsh. There was clearly a decision to move to a more graphically pleasing front end and to use more sophisticated linking tools. But we've lost functionality and resources as a result. I often used the SSA website as a pass through to other soaring resources. But those links are no longer easily accessible. As a result, I visit only once every week or two unless a contest is in progress. I don't mind the notion of spicing up the home page. That's a marketing decision. But we've lost a good number of resources during the transition. I had expectations that they would slowly return, but now I'm wondering if they ever will. I suspect resources are limited, and we are now devoted to developing the site rather than maintaining its content. Eric Greenwell wrote in message ... wrote: The new website is a disaster. They must have hired the same people who screwed up their computer system a couple years ago. Disaster? Seems kind of harsh for a web site that's done everything I wanted done: member locator, contest reports, contest rules, Johnson articles. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Website Mltry.- Your Information, Customized for You, Family Communication, Chat, Please Help by Visiting and Signing Gues | Wolf | Naval Aviation | 0 | January 8th 05 06:16 AM |
New SSA Website - No News | ZASoars | Soaring | 4 | August 18th 04 08:43 PM |
P-3 Orion website updated | Marco P.J. Borst | Naval Aviation | 0 | March 6th 04 08:21 PM |
P-3 Orion website updated | Marco P.J. Borst | Military Aviation | 0 | March 6th 04 08:21 PM |
Old website suddenly dies, replaced by new one | Jack Glendening | Soaring | 2 | February 8th 04 05:31 PM |