![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'll agree that a Private Pilot cannot be compensated monetarily for towing
services rendered, he may log PIC time towards additional ratings while towing. I'll also agree that 61.113 is very confusing.. but para (g) says he can act as PIC, it does not say be can be compensated. The insurance companies tend to rule ... Those that I have dealt with state that a Commercial Glider Operation, collecting fees from a ride passenger, require a Commercial rated power pilot in the tow plane. BT "Todd Pattist" wrote in message ... Many people are aware of the history surrounding the old waiver for a private pilot ASEL to tow gliders at a glider club. Without going into detail, it related to the issue of whether logging time was prohibited "compensation." To fix that "problem," 61.113 was amended to add section (g) which simply said "(g) A private pilot who meets the requirements of Sec. 61.69 of this part may act as pilot in command of an aircraft towing a glider." Of course that simple statement was already "true" since a private pilot who met the 61.69 requirements already had the right to tow. The purpose of the change was supposedly to do away with the waiver, but the way they wrote it was IMHO, a royal screw-up since the preamble in 61.113(a) said: "(a) Except as provided in paragraphs (b) through (g) of this section, no person who holds a private pilot certificate may act as pilot in command of an aircraft that is carrying passengers or property for compensation or hire; nor may that person, for compensation or hire, act as pilot in command of an aircraft." By allowing a pilot to act as PIC under the (g) exception the regs now allowed him to get out of the prohibitions of acting as PIC or receiving compensation while acting as PIC under (a). Thus, he could tow commercially and get paid. The Part 61 FAQ said this: "QUESTION: I have reviewed your question in which you asked whether a private pilot may receive compensation while towing gliders, in accordance with the new §61.113(g). ANSWER: The answer is no, a private pilot may not receive compensation for towing a glider. The intent, and the wording of the new §61.113(g), was to permit a private pilot who meets the requirements of §61.69 of this part to ". . . act as pilot in command of an aircraft towing a glider" for the purpose of logging pilot in command (PIC) time. The new rule was never intended to conflict with the FAA's long standing legal interpretations and policies on compensation for private pilots. And the wording of the new §61.113(g) only addresses the issue that permits a private pilot to ". . . act as pilot in command of an aircraft towing a glider" for the purpose of permitting a private pilot to log pilot in command time. As you recall, the wording of the old §61.69 permitted a private pilot to act as a PIC but was moot on logging the time. The new §61.113(g) was issued to correct it. However, we agree the wording of the new §61.113(a) may be confusing. In the next go-around on correcting some of the wording mistakes, we have recorded it as a candidate for correction to conform the intent and the wording of §61.113(g)." I note that Mr. Lynch's comments are not definitive and he's been wrong before. Some authority in the FAA disagreed with his comment here, and I don't know if it's still in the FAQ, nor whether an authoritative interpretation from the Chief Counsel's Office has been issued. However, I DO note that we have gone through a second rewrite of Part 61 for the Sport Pilot and they changed §61.113(g). Interestingly, they did *not* put in the "for the purpose of permitting a private pilot to log pilot in command time" language that Mr. Lynch tried to add above. Specifically, it now simply says: "(g) A private pilot who meets the requirements of §61.69 may act as a pilot in command of an aircraft towing a glider or unpowered ultralight vehicle." Looks to me like the rules are clear - a private pilot can be compensated for towing commercially. Your towplane insurance company may disagree :-) Todd Pattist - "WH" Ventus C (Remove DONTSPAMME from address to email reply.) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|