![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm preparing for my Private test, and in discussing it with the local FAA
examiner, he indicated that one item on the test is a landing with no drag devices, using only a turning and forward slips. As he explained it, the task in the PTS is to demonstrate the ability to land totally WITHOUT airbrakes, to simulate a landing wherein the airbrakes have failed. Throughout my training I've practiced many turning slips to FINAL APPROACH (to lose altitude) without airbrakes, but I have always ended the slip and landed normally by using the airbrakes. In fact, the PTS says "turning slips to LANDING, with and without the use of drag devices". (See the PTS task below.) He said this landing does not have to be to a precise point. R. TASK: SLIPS TO LANDING REFERENCES: Soaring Flight Manual, Glider Flight Manual. Objective. To determine that the applicant: 1. Exhibits knowledge of the elements related to forward, side, and turning slips to landing, with and without the use of drag devices. 2. Recognizes the situation where a slip should be used to land in a desired area. 3. Establishes a slip without the use of drag devices. 4. Maintains the desired ground track. 5. Maintains proper approach attitude. 6. Makes smooth, proper, and positive control applications during recovery from the slip. 7. Touches down smoothly within the designated landing area. Working through this with one of my instructors today (a very stable day with absolutely no wind), we had a hard time getting our Blanik L13 to descend steeply enough even with a complete, full-rudder slip. Even after extending the downwind, widening the pattern, and slipping all the way from the base turn, through the base leg, in the final turn and most of the final, we're still too high. We have to resort to using airbrakes or we float the entire length of the field. It would seem that we would need to extend the downwind extraordinarily, or as another instructor suggested, start the pattern uncomfortably low. We already were entering the 45 at 700' AGL instead of the usual 1000' . So two questions, for CFIs or examiners or recent test-takers: 1. Is this the common interpretation of the task below? No drag devices, all the way to the ground? 2. Have you experienced/how would you deal with what seems to be a rather low drag ratio even with a full-rudder slip? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Tamed by the Tailwheel | [email protected] | Piloting | 84 | January 18th 05 04:08 PM |
VW-1 C-121J landing with unlocked nose wheel | Mel Davidow LT USNR Ret | Military Aviation | 1 | January 19th 04 05:22 AM |
"I Want To FLY!"-(Youth) My store to raise funds for flying lessons | Curtl33 | General Aviation | 7 | January 9th 04 11:35 PM |
FAA Knowledge Test Results | Richard Moore | Instrument Flight Rules | 4 | October 12th 03 07:10 AM |
FAA Knowledge Test Results | Richard Moore | Simulators | 3 | October 12th 03 04:48 AM |