A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Polar Analysis from flight logs?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
Old January 7th 05, 05:54 PM
Tim.Ward
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Robert Ehrlich wrote:
"Lars P. Hansen" wrote:

OK, here we go: Could devices like this not also be used to detect

thermals?
The description in the link below about how the laser "sees" minute

dust
particles in the air seems to be well suited to thermals.


I don't buy the explanation they give in the cited url

(http://www.navysbir.brtrc.com/succes...navsea_p3.html)
They pretend the device measures the speed and direction of dust

particles
from the shift in the frequency of reflected light, this is well

known
as Doppler effect and can only give the radial component (toward or

away
from the sensor) of the speed, not its value and direction. For

thermals
we are interested in the speed component which is nearly

perpendicular
to the measured component, so this would be of little interest. Of

course
whith several such devices on the ground, all the 3 compenents of

airmass
speed could be measured, maybe this in the intended use of the device

as it
is advertised, but in a glider you don't have sufficient vertical

distance
for putting 2 devices which could provide an accurate value for the

vertical
component of the speed.


It does work, but they use a little different technique.
The Doppler is only measured on particles at the focal length of the
optics.
The assumption is that the airmass (at least locally) is all the same,
and that the Doppler measurement is taken far enough away so the
effects of the airplane on the airmass are negligible.
So you send out two beams -- say, one forward at 45 degrees, one aft at
45 degrees.
It turns out that if you sum the signals from the two beams, you get
the vertical component of velocity, and if you difference the two
signals, you get the horizontal component.
Since we're measuring frequency, we can get sum and difference
frequencies from a mixer, though I have no doubt it runs through a DSP
somewhere.

So you only need one sensor head (though it puts out multiple beams).

By sending out two more beams, to each side, you can also pick up
sideslip information.
The clever thing is that they're using components developed for the
communications field, which helps to keep costs down.

Tim Ward

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
RAF Blind/Beam Approach Training flights Geoffrey Sinclair Military Aviation 3 September 4th 09 06:31 PM
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Aerobatics 28 January 2nd 09 02:26 PM
new theory of flight released Sept 2004 Mark Oliver Aerobatics 1 October 5th 04 10:20 PM
Flight Simulator 2004 pro 4CDs, Eurowings 2004, Sea Plane Adventures, Concorde, HONG KONG 2004, World Airlines, other Addons, Sky Ranch, Jumbo 747, Greece 2000 [include El.Venizelos], Polynesia 2000, Real Airports, Private Wings, FLITESTAR V8.5 - JEP vvcd Piloting 0 September 22nd 04 07:13 PM
AmeriFlight Crash C J Campbell Piloting 5 December 1st 03 02:13 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:04 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.