![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I had a recent very positive experience from an SSA
X-C instructor. What a blast of fresh air. Totally thorough, totally professional, and never nitpickety. I'm thinking the SSA Master X-C program is great. And I look forward to some time in the mountains with the Carl Herold's and Rolf Peterson's of the world. But I also get a LOT from reading and listening about X-C flights of non-instructors. ENSURE for 24 hours before the flight to help with "relief" issues. Cautions about oxygen use and importance. The continual focus on landouts throughout X-C flight and the extensive landout preparation. Really great stuff from a lot of sources. Although I agree about the SSA Master X-C program, the info from non-instructors is great too, I think. Just like I think getting two pilots together for a flight is sometimes more enlightening than flying repeatedly with the same old instructor. In article , Steve Hill wrote: It's nice to hear others question the validity of useless statistics. How many privately owned L-13's or 2-33 are there in the US and how many of those ever embark on an cross country flight?? If all you want to do is train in 2-33's and L-13's and fly around within a 5 to 10 mile area of your local airport...then I'd agree you are at less risk in some ways and more in others. That's not what I do however. I take off and leave and come back generally many hours later. Are there risks?? Damn straight. But I accept them and understand them and work my butt off to have a logical plan to deal with them. And hope that I never need to excercise any of those plans, based on my ability to evaluate my own risk/reward equation and to always remember that flying is, at the end of the day a very personal reward. In a way, I believe you have cemented my view that in many cases, students are not receiving the information that helps them to attain their goals, and so they have to get it from osmosis, instead of an instructor. The SSA Master Instructor program is a great idea as well as the mentoring programs that some areas are fortunate enough to have...we need a ton more of that, from qualified sources. And again, not to sound like a broken record, but I believe that the training must become more dynamic and less static. The pearls of wisdom accrued over the years need to have a better venue to be shared. That's about it from me. Steve. -- ------------+ Mark J. Boyd |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Dear Denise | [email protected] | Soaring | 0 | February 3rd 05 03:22 PM |
From "Dear Oracle" | Larry Smith | Home Built | 0 | December 27th 03 04:25 AM |
Dear Jack - Elevator Turbulator tape question | Dave Martin | Soaring | 2 | October 14th 03 08:11 PM |
Burt Rutan "pissed off" | Tarver Engineering | Military Aviation | 22 | September 3rd 03 04:10 AM |
Burt Rutan | Dudley Henriques | Military Aviation | 0 | August 23rd 03 07:03 PM |