![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"T o d d P a t t i s t" wrote in message
... While I agree with Peter's basic premise, I'd phrase it differently. You are simply required to fly the aircraft within the W&B limits. You are foolish if you don't do enough to check that you are in those limits, but the FAR's aren't violated until you are actually outside the W&B limits. Well, I'd argue that the "all available information" requirement of 91.103 would include *knowledge* of the actual weight and balance situation. However, it's true there's no specific callout in the regulations to perform the necessary weight and balance checks. You're correct that simply performing the check is not sufficient. Since the airworthiness certificate is valid only when the airplane is loaded legally, even if you do the check, if you do it wrong you're in violation. Pete |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Same BA 747 loses engine again, Violated U.S. regulations | Big John | Piloting | 3 | March 8th 05 10:38 PM |
Ultra light Glider regulations | Denis G | Soaring | 5 | May 24th 04 06:19 PM |
ANN: WingX Version 1.2 - Federal Aviation Regulations on your PDA! | Hilton Software LLC | Piloting | 7 | October 17th 03 04:51 PM |
New UK Regulations | Soaring | 5 | October 2nd 03 12:13 AM | |
FAR:Safety Pilot & High Performance/Complex? | John T | Piloting | 53 | August 18th 03 04:04 PM |