A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Glass Panel Failure Rate?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #34  
Old March 15th 05, 09:52 PM
Happy Dog
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"jsmith" wrote in message

Now you're just being obtuse. You clearly connected the crash to a
failure of the MFD. WRT to the previous replacement of the MFD, you
said:
"learn about the multiple altitude and heading deviations in a short
period of time"
Do you have an argument that the "altitude and heading deviations" were
MFD failure related? Well? What makes them "interesting" WRT MFD
failure?


So what do you want me to say, he wasn't proficient at partial panel?


No. Why don't you insinuate that the pilot was intoxicated? I want you to
explain your reason for intimating that an MFD failure was responsible. I
think you're blowing smoke.

In this instance, the MFD was replaced three times within 80 hours of
flight.
I am sure they are under warranty, but isn't it a hassle to fly to the
avionics shop every 30-40 hours?


The above wordsmithing is known as "false dilemma". You enumerate
negative instances and then build an argument around it. Your posting
history shows a bias against MFDs. But you might want to stick to honest
discussion tactics if you don't want to ba called an idiot.


Not at all, I'm all for them. I just don't accept that all the
installation bugs are worked out of them.


You don't need to "accept" it because NOBODY has said or intimated or
hinted, or likely even *thought* that they are. Strawman argument.

My question is, "What's killing them?" (the MFDs)
I suspect heat, lack of ventilation.

Of course you do. Got any evidence? Please don't ask other posters to
"look it up" for themselves.


Look at a manual and read the thermal operating specifications. Usually
stated as something like "-20 to +120 degrees F".


In Florida in January? Anyway, the manual probably says that about the
whole plane. Have you read a POH for a Cessna.

Look at the King stacks in the new Cessna's. A checklist item is to turn
the Avionics Master on and listen for the fan to make certain it is
working.


God I hope you're not a lawyer.


So do I.


At least you're getting a fam flight on logical fallacies.

moo


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Aerobatics 28 January 2nd 09 02:26 PM
Glass Panel Scan? G Farris Instrument Flight Rules 6 October 13th 04 04:14 AM
TSA requirement of Security Awareness Training dancingstar Piloting 3 October 5th 04 02:17 AM
C182 Glass Panel Scott Schluer Piloting 15 February 27th 04 03:52 PM
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Piloting 25 September 11th 03 01:27 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:32 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.