![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hmm, why...
A great glide ratio - OK. But. They have just one attempt only. If failed... The precise calculation, correction maneuvers - I know. But if mistaken there is no go around. Considering terrain outside the strip... Still impressed. BTW, was that plane written off? Roman P.S. Actually, I am the glider sport pilot so I know quite well what it is about to land without engines :-) IMHO a jet plane with 300+ passengers aboard hardly be compared to a glider. Robert M. Gary wrote: I"m not sure why its such a surprise. The A330 has a great glide ratio. The pilots had lots of good tools (speed brakes etc) to place their landing. As I recall, they almost ended up being too high. -Robert, CFI (Certified Flight Instructor) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Is Your Airplane Susceptible To Mis Fu eling? A Simple Test For Fuel Contamination. | Nathan Young | Piloting | 4 | June 14th 04 06:13 PM |
Buying an L-2 | Robert M. Gary | Piloting | 13 | May 25th 04 04:03 AM |
faith in the fuel delivery infrastructure | Chris Hoffmann | Piloting | 12 | April 3rd 04 01:55 AM |
Use of 150 octane fuel in the Merlin (Xylidine additive etc etc) | Peter Stickney | Military Aviation | 45 | February 11th 04 04:46 AM |
50+:1 15m sailplanes | Paul T | Soaring | 92 | January 19th 04 01:59 AM |