![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 5 Jan 2005 12:25:09 -0800, "BTIZ"
wrote: Corky... the swages must still be checked against a "go - nogo" criteria .. measuring tool.. We had a control cable here that came apart in-flight, swage failed.. a tool was used that had previously been determined to produce substandard swages.. it was kept around for some reason.. another mechanic used it a couple years later on an aircraft and did not check the go/nogo, That's a good story BTIZ, but does not address the point. The point is the cheapo tool works just as well as the expensive tool. Yes, you should always check with a go-no-go guage. Corky Scott |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FS: Papco #600 Flaring Tool | Michael Burton | Home Built | 0 | October 27th 03 05:26 PM |
canopy breaking tool? | Russell Duffy | Home Built | 33 | September 30th 03 11:39 PM |