![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
OK, I've been lurking on this topic long enough.
I regullarly make low-pass finnish at the end of the majority of my soaring flights, and know when and where to expect other aircraft in the traffic pattern. I plan and adjust my actions acrodingly. In addition to my experience flying gliders I also have over 600 hours of instruction given in the Southern California airspace (flying powered aircraft), along with over 500 hours of flying a Beech Bonanza corporatly into the majority of class Bravo airports through out the country. With all of my experiences the closest that I have come to being in a mid-air is not finnishing at the gliderport, but flying VFR traffic patterns with students at untowered fields. This is by far the closest resemblience to a finish cylinder that the majority of pilots encounter during their flying carrier. Even though there are recomended procedures to enter a VFR pattern pilots will choose to otherwise depending on their situation. Conversely, flying an ILS approach most closely resembles a finish gate senario: all the traffic is flying the same direction, for the same destination (how i miss AST's). When a pilot reports the final approach fix on an ILS (or for any instrument appraoch) you know exactly where he is at, the same holds true for finnish gate procedures with a common final turnpoint, four miles is going to be four miles! My concern has never been that I am going to climb into someone (or that some one is going to climb into me), but that we are going to converge on each other. The only mid-air collision that I have personal knowledge of, that occured in the traffic pattern, happend when two of my colleuges were turning from cross-wind to down-wind, in a Duchess, when a Mooney struck them after making an improper postion report, and this was at a towered field! (See http://www.ntsb.gov/ntsb/brief.asp?e...27X05234&key=2 NTSB Report:LAX02FA288B) SO.... I contend that the finish cylinder is not going to provide safety at a contest. I conceed that there are locations where a finish cylinder does provide a better finishing enviroment, considering other airport operations. Ideally by providing an established finishing routine (I like the ideas of mandatory final turns) we as pilots can provide better position reports facilitating our communications with each other over the radio - the best tool that we have to avoid mid-airs and make the finish area (gate or otherwise) a safer environment. Orion Kingman DV8 Phoenix |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Seniors Contest | Bob Fidler | Soaring | 68 | March 17th 05 03:50 AM |
2005 Region 7 Contest | Paul Remde | Soaring | 0 | August 13th 04 03:48 AM |
Survival and Demise Kit; Contest Points | Jim Culp | Soaring | 1 | June 21st 04 04:35 AM |
USA Double Seater Contest | Thomas Knauff | Soaring | 1 | April 13th 04 05:24 PM |
30th Annual CCSC Soaring Contest | Mario Crosina | Soaring | 0 | March 17th 04 06:31 AM |