![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hahaha...
I'l try this in the 2-33 at Vne (about 80 knots) and see if I get over 200 ft 'regained' I doubt it. But then again, that's maybe off topic. I think your calculations are for gliders that don't fly like they have a parachute attached to the back, right? ![]() I'm sure even the Blanik will get numbers fairly close to what you write, but I'lll give it a go (at altitude). Passengers love to 'zoom' so this should be fun... At 06:30 27 March 2005, Bruce Hoult wrote: In article , M B wrote: It occurs to me that if someone is on final glide at the end of a competition, they may pick a speed (like 85 knots) which their computer says is optimal for points, but which is both: 1) too fast for a rolling finish/landing and 2) too slow for a pull up, turn around, and landing. Is that an accurate assessment? Would a competition pilot be put in a situation where he must decide between points and safety of the landing? It seems to me that 85 knots is a little too slow to do a full circuit from, but plenty do do a 180, or a 360, or an abbreviated circuit similar to a rope-break exercise. Someone gave a figure of 9 ft of pullup for each knot of speed. That's about right for speeds around 110 knots, but is a gross overestimate for speeds around 80 or 90 knots (and an underestimate for higher speeds). The true numbers are quadratic. If you want a rule of thumb I suggest the following: take speed in knots, double it, drop off the last digit, square what is left giving height for a pull-up in feet. This calculation gives just over 90% of the theoretical maximum pull-up, which is proabably not a bad figure taking into the drag loses. Note that this is for a pull up to a zero speed hammerhead. For a pull up to flying speed you need to subtract the appropriate height for your circuit speed e.g. 100 ft for 50 knots. examples, from zero-height finish, 50 knot circuit speed: 50 knots - 100 - 10, squared = 100 ft gain, 0 ft AGL @ 50 kt 60 knots - 120 - 12, squared = 144 ft gain, 44 ft AGL @ 50 kt 80 knots - 160 - 16, squared = 256 ft gain, 156 ft AGL @ 50 kt 90 knots - 180 - 18, squared = 324 ft gain, 224 ft AGL @ 50 kt 100 knots - 200 - 20, squared = 400 ft gain, 300 ft AGL @ 50 kt 120 knots - 240 - 24, squared = 576 ft gain, 476 ft AGL @ 50 kt 150 knots - 300 - 30, squared = 900 ft gain, 800 ft AGL @ 50 kt A pull up from 85 knots to 50 knots will give you about a 200 ft height gain, plus whatever height your finish was at. We give students rope breaks at 200 ft, right? So a competent and alert pilot should have no trouble deciding whether to land straight ahead after the pull up or do an abbreviated circuit. -- Bruce | 41.1670S | \ spoken | -+- Hoult | 174.8263E | /\ here. | ----------O---------- Mark J. Boyd |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
AmeriFlight Crash | C J Campbell | Piloting | 5 | December 1st 03 02:13 PM |
Single-Seat Accident Records (Was BD-5B) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 41 | November 20th 03 05:39 AM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 01:27 PM |