![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 09:22:01 -0700, Shawn
sdotcurry@bresnananotherdotnet wrote in :: Larry Dighera wrote: Could this be the future? Looks pricey. Currently it is. But with a growth rate of 30% per year, the photovoltaic industry is being targeted by venture capitalists: http://www.nanosolar.com/cache/nyt.htm . With the rising cost of oil, and the influx of capital, the future is looking even brighter for solar power. If the volume of photovoltaic production continues to increase as projected, the cost should fall. And technological advancements would help push prices down too. After quick search on the web flexible solar cells cost about $5/watt or more. 15,000 watts worth of power (20 hp) is gonna cost, and that's basicly the cost of the "fuel". If you're burning say 4 gallons/hour at $3/gallon the $75,000 worth of solar cells will cost the same as 6000+ hours of flight. Plus, that's a lot of amps and volts running around. Shawn This quote confirms your calculations: http://www.nanosolar.com/cache/Forbes.htm Manufacturers, led by Japanese companies such as Sharp, are convinced that within seven years traditional solar-cell technology will deliver power as cheaply and conveniently as steam turbines. The economics of solar, once derided as hippie wishful thinking, are getting pretty compelling. "When I started in the early 1970s, the going price for solar modules was about $200 per watt," recalls Arthur Rudin, director of engineering for Sharp's solar systems division in Huntington Beach, Calif. "Today the average price for solar modules is about $5 a watt." However there appears to be some hope of reducing the cost: In March 2002 Alivisatos put his reputation--and his venture capitalists' money--where his mouth is, turning over much of his research to a Palo Alto firm called Nanosys. The company has amassed $75 million and is devoting much effort to figuring out how to embed nanofilaments of semiconductors in cheap, bendable plastic sheets. Nanosys' goals: 10% efficiency, $1 per watt. http://www.nanosolar.com/ http://www.nanosolar.com/cache/nyt.htm A new generation of solar cells based on lightweight conductive plastics could cost as little as $40 a square meter, compared with $400 for the silicon panels that have been used since the 1970's. These so-called organic solar cells could make solar a viable option even without government subsidies, experts say. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
NTSB: USAF included? | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 10 | September 11th 05 10:33 AM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions List (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | September 2nd 04 05:15 AM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | June 2nd 04 07:17 AM |
PC flight simulators | Bjørnar Bolsøy | Military Aviation | 178 | December 14th 03 12:14 PM |
AmeriFlight Crash | C J Campbell | Piloting | 5 | December 1st 03 02:13 PM |