![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Morgans wrote: "Blueskies" wrote That is an in-flight adjustable prop, not constant speed but still adjustable. I think the writer is saying the weight compares favorably with a IO-360 with all accessories and a constant speed prop. The only real operational issue is the requirement to watch the prop pitch control vs. manifold pressure and twiddle as necessary to set the power; not quite as easy as a constant speed but configurable never-the-less... Right. I think other people's hesitations about the poster saying the V-8 is lighter, is possibly justified. Nevertheless, the possible heavier weight should be more than offset by the higher HP, and I commend someone giving alternate power a real, (from how it appears) well thought out application, a chance to work. As far as claims of fantastic economy goes, I think that anyone claiming to be getting *substantially* better than .38 lbs/hp/hr, even with a modern liquid cooled engine, are suspect. Good luck to the OP. I wish I were involved in the project. Test test test, before flying! -- Jim in NC Let me clear up some things. My plane is tied down in its hangar at almost 7000 feet msl. So the 310 hp is down 22% right off the bat, now it's at 240 or so. The fuel flow for that HP range is damn close. I agree that any motor running below .38-.40 is pushing the limit on thermal dynamics of current technology. I admit that there is some cutting edge stuff in my motor that helps squeeze out more hp per pound of fuel. For instance my egt is running 1600 + on takeoff but this also has an explanation. my probe is in the collector, not the head pipe so the the egt number looks high for sure. Took me a while to find some trick collector gaskets that can stand that kind of temp. An aircooled motor in the low .40 range is kinda hard to believe. Now if they add some ceramic goodies to their product they might get close. Lyc and Cont are realizing they are so far behind the tech curve that stating the FADEC is the future of their aircooled powerplants is like buying a bridge somewhere. Truth is Horsepower=Heat. The better one converts that to motion is ahead of the pack. I believe Dave Hyde asked the question ,How did a 0-360 gain so much weight.Well, lets add things up. 0-360 "Bare" and dry is 293,, Maybe,, add starter,Flywheel, ringgear, alt, fuel system and pump, fuel lines, shrouds, mags, wiring harness, brackets, exhaust system, mufflers, heat muffs, Scat tubes, clamps, oil filter, oil, oil cooler,oil lines,engine mount, cowling, prop, governor, bolts, nuts, Etc !!!!! I have weighed a Lyc all dressed out and it is alot heavier then most people think. Only in America can one create a better flying mouse trap....God Bless the USA !!!!!!! Ben Haas N801BH Jackson Hole Wyoming |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
fuel flow measurement | khanindra jyoti deka | Home Built | 0 | January 5th 05 04:34 AM |
advanced fuel flow mesurement system using microcontroller | khanindra jyoti deka | Home Built | 4 | January 4th 05 01:18 AM |
spaceship one | Pianome | Home Built | 169 | June 30th 04 05:47 AM |
Yo! Fuel Tank! | Veeduber | Home Built | 15 | October 25th 03 02:57 AM |
Pumping fuel backwards through an electric fuel pump | Greg Reid | Home Built | 15 | October 7th 03 07:09 PM |