![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() We have some turf wars going on and it looks like the pilots may be the losers. First: we have a small airport with two runways 18/36 at 3000' X 75 and 06/24 at 3800' X 75. No scheduled flights or even charters at present. We are finally reaching the point where pilots are congregating around a couple areas on the field around and in specific hangars, or several hangars. Up till a couple years ago the place was dead except on week ends and after work in warm weather. Now we have a lot of activity most of the day what with the pilots congregating. They've also restored a couple planes and purchased another. These are active pilots who fly a lot. The one couple has flown a new SR-22 nearly 500 hours since last June when they purchased it new. The guys in the one hangar are flying at least 30 hours a week (maybe as much as 50 with three small planes (two tail draggers and a 150) There are a couple instructors in there as well. After flying they hang around the hangar, have a couple beers and eat pop corn. As one of the Airport advisory members told the city, "this is the kind of activity we should be encouraging". Basically they know every one on the field. As the AOPA says, they are our best security as they'd instantly recognize, or rather not recognize any one not normally there.. The FBO has taken exception to this. He does not like the pilots parking on the field around the hangers. Actually, he has a feud going with a couple guys in the one hangar and classes any one else over there as being with them and against them. The cars do not impede aircraft movements. No one drinks and flys. He has bent the city's ear to the point they have a draft of new regulations, but at least are asking for pilot input. Did I mention a couple of the guys in there are mechanics? The ones he's feuding with? There is another group on the other side of the field but he can't see them from his hangar and isn't feuding with any of them (at present) They do not want any cars on the field except when the pilots go to their specific hangar. Parking will be in designated areas, No alcohol on the filed (zero tolerance meaning none even in cars or trucks) Cars will require a permit be displayed in the window at all times. I have a bad back and need to park right by the hangar. Your wife and kids, or friends will need to be escorted in to your hanger, or be escorted out to the plane after you taxi to the ramp. Landings will be on runways only. No grass and no taxiways. This kinda puts a crimp in tail draggers on windy days, or practicing emergency landings, or real soft field landings. This came about when a tail dragger practicing emergency procedure landed on a taxiway. (Some of the help doesn't recognize safe and unsafe operations. If it's different, then it must be unsafe) Good thing they weren't watching when I did an engine out and over shot the turn to the runway while still 20 feet in the air.. It was safe, but would probably have scared the crap out of the one individual. There's much more, but the changes run about 5 pages not counting another set for ultra lights and another set for "parachute" operations. He's been bending enough ears that the city is doing a lot of this out of CYA ignorance and trying to pretend they have a big airport. Once they got the city attorney involved they are trying to cover every possible legal alternative. Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member) (N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair) www.rogerhalstead.com |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|