![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
i know of
a few who have tried to use the IVO in flight adjustable prop for high speed flight, and found it less than satisfactory. Since the inboard portion doesnt rotate as much, it must produce some "flat plate" drag.. anecdotal reports of a 10 mph penalty on a 200 mph aircraft are what I recall. Thats at least partially true of all inflight adjustable props. For a particular speed and power there is an ideal shape that can be achieved by fixed pitch props. The adjustable (CS) props design their shape for an average effect over the speed range. But the adjustable prop still gives a decent high speed efficiency while giving that extra safety factor at takeoff and landing - takeoff like a slingshot and you can really slow down the plane on landing with low pitch setting. So you have to take your choices - can't have everything. ---------------------------------------- SQ2000 canard http://www.abri.com/sq2000 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Options | [email protected] | Soaring | 32 | March 14th 05 05:33 PM |
Countering Widespread Ignorance About the National Guard | Rick Folkers | Military Aviation | 80 | March 14th 04 02:54 AM |
Fw: For Countering Widespread Ignorance about the National Guard | George Z. Bush | Military Aviation | 1 | March 3rd 04 10:02 PM |
Fw: For Countering Widespread Ignorance about the National Guard | George Z. Bush | Military Aviation | 1 | March 3rd 04 05:08 AM |