![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Kev" wrote in message oups.com... The AI is an instrument that's overdue for better human engineering. Almost everyone's had a moment of confusion figuring out which way the plane was banking, because of the way the horizon moves but the airplane "wings" stay level. Regardless of the form of the instrument, there will always be a "momentary confusion". There are two mismatched lines... one "moving" and one "fixed". No matter which form of AI is used, there is ALWAYS "momentary confusion" until we understand WHICH ONE is it that our control input will affect correctly (to bring into alignment with the other). I believe NASA's done studies showing that if you simply had the current AI's "wings" tilt towards the side you were turning, pilots had no problem instantly understanding their situation. I suppose that depends on how you teach pilots their relationship to their environment. If pilots feel themselves "fixed inside" the AIRPLANE, oriented in space the same as is the airplane, then it makes more sense that they will feel at ease "controlling" the FIXED line and matching it to the movable one. If they feel themselves to be fixed relative to the earth, and therefore controlling the aircraft from "outside", like a video game or an RC model, they will feel at ease controlling the MOVABLE line to match it to the fixed one. I have flown an aircraft, and I have flown a model. In both cases I have had no trouble understanding which "line" I had to control, but also in both cases I have experienced that momentary "confusion". I could be wrong but.... ....I would think that from an unusual attitude in VMC, a pilot's first reaction would be to try align his dashboard (fixed relative to pilots vision) with the horizon (movable relative to pilot's vision). Why this should be different in IMC, requiring the opposite form of AI, you can explain to me. By the way, I am assuming that Jay really meant to have his laser line projected onto the windshield as a HUD, not onto the panel.... on the panel its just an wider version of the current AI, isn't it??? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Indicator for Narco 12D | Mike Adams | Owning | 1 | July 6th 04 06:19 PM |
Inaccurate airspeed indicator | Wyatt Emmerich | Instrument Flight Rules | 20 | April 20th 04 12:08 AM |
Looking for Cessna Caravan pilots | [email protected] | Owning | 9 | April 1st 04 02:54 AM |
PC flight simulators | Bjørnar Bolsøy | Military Aviation | 178 | December 14th 03 12:14 PM |
Constant speed or constant attitude? | Jim | Soaring | 37 | September 3rd 03 12:41 PM |