|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#2
April 17th 05, 10:50 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Again.. practical "need" is not a "legal requirement". Maybe the lawyer
wanted the business of drawing the lease up or something.. or was protecting his turf in doing that sort of business. Dave Peter wrote: Dave S wrote A "dry lease" is a business decision, not a regulatory requirement. That I can understand. What is bizzare is that I have heard from a person who says he is a qualified NY lawyer state that the need for a dry lease comes from some sort of interaction between the FAR requirements and renting an aircraft outside the USA. Peter. -- Return address is invalid to help stop junk mail. E-mail replies to but remove the X and the Y. Please do NOT copy usenet posts to email - it is NOT necessary. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Mandatory 100hr checks - when? Also Dry Lease | Michael | Owning | 11 | April 24th 05 02:44 AM |
| Mandatory 100hr checks - when? Also Dry Lease | Dave S | General Aviation | 1 | April 17th 05 10:50 PM |
| Mandatory 100hr checks - when? Also Dry Lease | Doug | Owning | 0 | April 13th 05 05:27 PM |
| Boeing Boondoggle | Larry Dighera | Military Aviation | 77 | September 15th 04 02:39 AM |
| Rules on what can be in a hangar | Brett Justus | Owning | 13 | February 27th 04 05:35 PM |
Threaded Mode