![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The competition director has his hands full when tasking sports class
because of the vast differences in sailplane types in the class. If he gives the Nimbus driver a challenging task, the 1-26 driver will have no chance of completing the task. For this reason Assigned Task is not allowed. At first glance the turn Area Task appears to solve the problem, call a couple of 25 mile circles and let the pilots fly the distance that their ships performance dictates. Problem is; its too easy. Day after day we drive into the first turn area while keeping an eye on the second turn area. Go as deep as good conditions allow and then head for the second turn area as we follow the clouds and/or other sailplanes. The only real challenge is deciding when to quit and head for home. Our computers do a real good job of making this decision for us. I feel the TAT should only be called on days that the weather is predicted to blow-up, but we just don't know exactly where or when. That leaves us with the Modified assigned task. This is the best task to call when weather conditions are fairly predictable. Assign several turn points and the higher performance ships can continue on to several other turn points. The low performance ship can quit any time after the first turn and head for home. Sounds good, but is it challenging and is it always fair? I have seen the first called turn, 60 miles down-wind (20 knots), the K-6 didn't make it home that day. Another problem with 11 turn points available, is the desirability of running close-in triangles, maybe several times, no real challenge there. I suppose a clever CD could call a MAT with NO turn points specified and a MAXIMUM of 2 turn points allowed and say, 3 hour minimum time. Each contestant would be forced to fly an out-&-return or triangle that used up the alloted 3 hours. It would bring back the Non-WUSS tasking of yesteryear. One would be forced to choose the best direction and a turn point or two that was far enough to use up the allotted time (3 hrs). We would be forced to actually go all the way to our chosen turn point and not be allowad to turn short when conditions didn't look ideal ahead. Thirty years ago sports class started with a book of selected triangles and each contestant was required to fly one of them (at least as far as his minimum distance). The CD would announce the scratch distance (the distance he thought the Standard Cirrus should be able to fly that day). Each contestant would divide his handicap factor into the scratch distance and come up with his minimum distance. It was a real challenge, first off, what direction to go? Then choose a triangle that looked good to you. One could keep ones options open with several triangles that could be used in the chosen direction. The minimum distance has been replaced with a minimum time, but the concept can be used again. I think challenging tasks are still available. We could call it the Non-WUSS-MAT. Whe wants to give it a try? JJ |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Carrying flight gear on the airlines | Peter MacPherson | Piloting | 20 | November 25th 04 12:29 AM |
"I Want To FLY!"-(Youth) My store to raise funds for flying lessons | Curtl33 | General Aviation | 7 | January 9th 04 11:35 PM |
One Design viability? | Stewart Kissel | Soaring | 41 | December 10th 03 03:27 AM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |
Contest dates? 2004 18m nats / 15m nats/ sports class nats | John | Soaring | 0 | September 4th 03 05:37 AM |