![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Chris W" wrote in message
news:gj%ae.640$zv1.481@lakeread07... Is there an altitude above the ridge line at which the "mountain wave" effect isn't significant? Probably would be pretty negligible at 23,000 miles. For example. ![]() Seriously though, yes...you can sometimes fly high enough to avoid the wave. But that depends on the height of the terrain, the strength of the wind, and of course the type of aircraft. There is no reliable way to know ahead of time how high you need to fly to avoid it. That said, there's being high enough to get all the way out of any noticeable effects of the wave, and then there's being high enough to avoid the wave forcing you too close to the terrain. The former may be impossible, depending on the situation. The latter is usually possible. I have rarely experienced altitude excursions of greater than 2000-3000 feet as a result of mountain wave, so that's a pretty reliable margin for crossing ridges. Of course, there is the question of whether mountain wave can actually push you into the ground. I've never actually heard of that happening, and for it to do so, the part of the air mass you're flying in would have to hit the ground as well. That happens in microbursts, or under virga, for example, but you'd have to be pretty darn close to the ground in the first place for a mountain wave to push you into it. From a practical perspective, a couple of things to consider: higher up may provide less turbulence (though, don't try to fly through a rotor cloud). Also, if you want to most efficiently use the mountain wave to your advantage, pitch up and slow down while it's making you go up, and pitch down and speed up while it's making you go down. This will increase the magnitude of your altitude changes, but you'll be spending less time during the "bad" down areas and more time during the "good" up areas. Fighting the mountain wave is just that: fighting. And no one wins a fight with Mother Nature. Of course, in practice you may have upper and lower limits to acceptable altitudes, and those need to be taken into account. But inasmuch as you can allow your altitude to vary with the wave, let it. Pete |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
NTSB: USAF included? | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 10 | September 11th 05 10:33 AM |
TSA rule 49 CFR Part 1552 (or its misinterpretation) is already preventing people from flying (even renters) (long) | Bay Aviator | Piloting | 15 | October 21st 04 10:29 PM |
the thrill of flying interview is here! | Dudley Henriques | Piloting | 0 | October 21st 03 07:41 PM |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 01:27 PM |