![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I'd like to acquire the available wisdom on pricing flight time (though I'll forgo standing on a single leg for now {8^). This is for a club, but I'm sure it's the same problem for a partnership or even a single owner. The only difference is that a club has multiple aircraft, but we price such that no airplane can subsidize another. So that we've multiple aircraft shouldn't be much of a difference (at least as far as I can see). My question: How do you decide what it costs to fly for an hour? I know the basic idea is to accumulate all the variable costs and fit this into the price somehow. But, as far as I can tell, this makes an assumption: that each hour costs the same. For fuel, this is probably not too far off. But I've some small evidence that, for maintenance, this can be quite a bad assumption. The scenario that's raised this in my mind is actually, on the face of it, a Good Thing. My club recently went from three to four aircraft. But we still fly about the same amount of time as before. So aircraft utilization rates have gone down. This is a Good Thing, in that booking an airplane is now far easier. However, the drop has impacted one particular airplane more than any of the others. It's the "middle" airplane: neither a 172 nor a 182RG; "just" a 182. As I wrote, the change to availability is terrific. But the reduced utilization has a pricing impact, and I'm afraid that it's going to worsen the utilization over time. While variable maintenance costs on this airplane may be lower than in previous years, they're still higher on a per hour basis because of the smaller number of hours flown. This will drive the price of the plane up, causing utilization to drop further. Repeat. If we were correct in our assumption that all hours cost the same, then this wouldn't happen. The cost of maintenance would drop proportionally with the hours flown, and the aforementioned cycle of rising price and dropping use wouldn't occur. But the drop in maintenance cost is not fully proportionate, and the per-hour maintenance cost is going up. So...how does one avoid the cycle of rising price and dropping use that I've described. One obvious choice is to bring in enough members to drive utilization up again, but that would cost us our good availability. Any other possibilities? - Andrew |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Parachute fails to save SR-22 | Capt.Doug | Piloting | 72 | February 10th 05 05:14 AM |
I am in The Killing Zone | Marco Rispoli | Piloting | 68 | June 14th 04 05:16 PM |
Looking for Cessna Caravan pilots | [email protected] | Owning | 9 | April 1st 04 02:54 AM |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 01:27 PM |