![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Udo Rumpf wrote: Of course it would be true, at 80km/k you would be flying to slow if you tried to thermal. This is minimum sink speed in level flight at 6.5 lb/sqft. at 7.5 lb/sqft you would be approaching stall speed. To recap the ASW24 does not have to be flown any faster then other glider of its type. Two gliders you have mentioned have a much lighter wingloading and the Discus and the ASW24 with 7.5 lb/sqft will fly at about the same speed. Now I know how misinformation gets started. Regards Udo Udo, A related question in terms of data points. How significant is the in-flight CG on climb performance? It's purely subjective, but my LS8 seems to climb markedly better now that I've moved the CG back to about 80% of aft limit (from a previous 45%). Locically, aft CG would reduce the amount of lift (nose up pitch) required of the elevator/stabilizer, reducing induced drag from these surfaces. As a percentage of total induced drag I'm sure this relatively small, but is it significant? Erik Mann (P3) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|