A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Altimeter settings: QNH versus QFE



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
Old June 2nd 05, 06:34 PM
Graeme Cant
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

stephanevdv wrote:
Just another point in this discussion: when I look at an approach map of
an airfield, the pattern altitude is expressed as a height above
ground.

The only ones I knew did that were the old Aeradio ones published for BA
when they used QFE. Never seen a Jepp chart in QFE - but I guess
they're produced that way for some operators.

If you want to fly QNH, pattern altitudes should be expressed AMSL.

They almost always are on the charts I've seen.

By the way, here in Europe (except UK, of course) glider altimeters are
in meters, not feet, thereby conforming to ICAO annex 5

True. But in non-conformity to the great bulk of aviation globally. A
classic example of the problems of one-nation one-vote in these matters.

BTW - Aren't your altimeters in metres, not meters?

whose purpose
it is to standardize units of measurement to the ISU

No. Its purpose is just to standardise measurements. Feet are
perfectly good units to standardise on.

. As the approach
maps (and other aviation maps) usually are in feet, we already have to
make computations anyhow.

Well stop resisting. Learn to think in feet instead of metres.

It's high time we got rid of feet, knots and nautical miles! Their only
real purpose in aviation seems to be to make it more difficult to get a
pilot's licence, as you have to adjust to a new set of units. (Yes, I
know there are certain countries where they like to use outdated unit
systems. I also know the classical arguments like "a nautical mile
equals a minute of latitude", but how often do you fly true north or
south?)


ICAO working document(23/9/04): "...a study...completed in 1997,
indicated that 97% of jet aircraft worldwide were non-SI equipped
aircraft. Moreover, a growing number of non-SI equipped aircraft were
being operated by airlines of the small number of States which use SI
units."

You'll be flying in feet, knots and nautical miles for quite a while.
Better relax and go with the flow.

GC


--
stephanevdv
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted via OziPilots Online [ http://www.OziPilotsOnline.com.au ]
- A website for Australian Pilots regardless of when, why, or what they fly -

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Altimeter settings: QNH versus QFE [email protected] Soaring 28 June 6th 05 12:26 PM
Reading back altimeter settings? Paul Tomblin Piloting 31 April 12th 05 04:53 PM
ATC Altimeter Settings O. Sami Saydjari Instrument Flight Rules 81 April 11th 05 08:07 PM
Pressure Altitude and Terminology Icebound Piloting 0 November 27th 04 09:14 PM
Local altimeter at BFM Dan Luke Instrument Flight Rules 3 June 15th 04 02:01 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:12 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.