![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Let me throw in my five cents: as a student pilot, I helped to rebuild
our club's Ka-6, Ka-8's and Ka-13, which were already pretty old back then and had racked up some hours in a rough club operation. Apart from one aft fuselage bulkhead separating from the skin on the Ka-6 due to constant mishandling (lifting and pushing on the elevator), I have not seen any structural problems with the glued joints. Very old ships built with Kasein (a milk protein based glue, similar to 'Elmer's wood and paper glue') have a problem if allowed to become wet over and over again. This glue tends to dissolve or be eaten by a fungus. The factory built ships were glued with a phenolic resin glue (one brand name was - or still is - 'Aerodux'), and that stuff does seem to hold up very well. Personnaly, I would prefer a wooden ship over a metal ship when flying the wave. The buying decision wood vs. metal has to be based on what you are planning to do with the ship, i.e. tie down outside or derig / store in trailer or a dry hangar. Uli Neumann F.L. Whiteley wrote: Alas, resorcinal glues, unlike wood, have a limited service life. Reportedly this is about 40 years or so. I seem to recall some issues with a few K-6 aft frames at about 25-30 years. But that may depend on how they were stored also. Regluing is an option. Each wooden wing recover process I've had the opportunity to peak into has also involved the re-gluing of several rib parts and stringers. Perhaps some of those who've restored vintage gliders might comment further on the life of older glues and modern glue developments. Frank Whiteley 01-- Zero One wrote: Bob, et. Al., The question remains... what about the glue joints and other extra-material aspects of aging wood ships? Larry Zero One " wrote in message : Bob Whelan wrote: Matthieu wrote (w. snips)... What would be a nice metal equivalent of the KA6E or Foka 4? I am asking because those ships are 40+ years old now and I am concerned about the aging wood... Should I be concerned? Peace of mind would seem to incompatible w. structural concern of any kind, regardless of validity. (FWIW, I've never been able to talk myself into flying wood ships. Wood I trust...but those glue joints are another mental matter!) - - - - - - SNIP My experience - if it was done well originally you never have a problem again. If I compare the loose rivets and other problems on the L13s that fly at our club to the wood wing Scheibe ships there is no comparison. Have seen a student land a Bergfalke on the main wheel and one wingtip - the Scheibe survived a spectacular groundloop with the only damage to the wing being a hole where the tip wheel pulled out - try that in metal... -- Bruce Greeff Std Cirrus #57 I'm no-T at the address above. -+- \_________0_________/ |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|