![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Peter Duniho wrote:
"Larry Dighera" wrote in message news ![]() [...] So I appears that my recollection was faulty. But it seems counter intuitive, that a 90-degree crosswind contributes half its velocity to a tailwind component. That's because you need to take into account the application of that particular resource. Applying that sort of thinking to cruise flight IS counter-intuitive, because it's not correct in that context. It's not even literally correct in the context of the article you quoted, but nevertheless the article you quoted has useful information in it. First, it's a discussion of landing, not cruising. Second, it's a collection of rules of thumb, not a precise analysis of reality. It is easy to show that mathematically, a 90 degree crosswind results in no tailwind component. Without a correction, it results in no headwind component as well. I'd like you to show that since it is easy. And a crosswind is relative to your track, not your heading. OK, now show us the math! :-) Matt |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|