|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#14
June 14th 05, 05:21 AM
|
|||
|
|||
wrote in message
oups.com... The reason these engines failed is MORE COMPLICATED than the fact they were at 41,000'. These planes can fly at 41,000'. What happened is related to how they got to 41,000'. They got there by exceeding the maximum climb rate. Interesting theory. Please share with us where you obtained that information. Your theory seems the most plausible of anything I've heard, but the NTSB hasn't released the final report, nor have I seen any specific information about the climb they executed. Do you actually have a reference for your statement, or are you just guessing? Pete 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
| Palo Alto airport, potential long-term problems... | [email protected] | Piloting | 7 | June 6th 05 11:32 PM |
| rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | November 1st 03 06:27 AM |
| rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | October 1st 03 07:27 AM |
| Where to soar near Jefferson City - Missouri? | Peter | Soaring | 2 | September 15th 03 03:29 PM |
Threaded Mode