A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Would Computerized ATC Intentionally Under Report Safety Deficiencies?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #16  
Old June 29th 05, 04:15 PM
Icebound
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Larry Dighera" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 28 Jun 2005 21:21:35 -0600, Newps wrote
in ::


The FAA can't get STARS into hardly any facilities, you think this new
system will make it to any?


It is unfortunate about STARS. But I believe further incremental ATC
automation is inevitable. It's just a question of time and money.
The will seems to be there.


The key word is "incremental".

People hate "incremental" because it smacks of "Band-Aid" "patching"
"putting money into an old system", etc..., They want this "new system" that
will immediately be all things to all people, as evidenced by the quotes
which you posted earlier.

If you could only get them to accept "incremental". It can be sloppy along
the way with two-steps-forward-one-step-back, but at the end of 25 years,
the system would probably compare very favourably against "today".


From what I read, STARS began with "a rocky start" in 1996, and in 2001 the
Executive vice president of Raytheon was testifying to the subcommittee that
"software development for Full STARS is nearing completion and is low risk."
http://www.house.gov/transportation/...archilena.html


And now I read from you "It is *unfortunate* about STARS" ?????!!!!!!

Well, not just from you. Here is a quote from the US Newswire just
yesterday (June 28) at:
http://releases.usnewswire.com/GetRelease.asp?id=49584

"Boston Terminal Radar Approach Control (TRACON), the country's newest
Federal Aviation Administration consolidated facility, is suffering from
numerous problems and technical failures related to radio and land-line
communications as well as the Standard Terminal Automation Replacement
System (STARS), which is becoming not only a source of daily concern to air
traffic controllers at the 18-month-old facility but an aviation safety
concern as well."

Just the kind of stuff the travelling public wants to read 10 years and 1.7
billion later.

In the end, will STARS be one of the two-steps-forward-one-step-back
increments along the way, nothing more... albeit an expensive one???




 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Report blames pilots, outdated manual for Blue Angels crash Matt Naval Aviation 0 June 2nd 05 08:31 PM
12 Dec 2003 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News Otis Willie Naval Aviation 0 December 12th 03 11:01 PM
Report: Sedatives found in pilot's blood Otis Willie Military Aviation 0 November 15th 03 11:55 PM
Senator asks Navy for report on pilot Otis Willie Naval Aviation 0 July 17th 03 10:08 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:26 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.