![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I posted a while back that I have given up my long-time (OK, "relatively"
long-time) subscription to Jeppesen in lieu of Sporty's IFR ChartViewer. Just to recap, I can get a year-long subscription to the ChartViewer and get every approach, departure, arrival, minimums, etc. that are printed in the NACO packs for every airport in the US all for just a few dollars more than a yearly subscription to just the Mid-Atlantic Jepp pack. There simply is no contest. The trick is using that technology in the cockpit. I tried it for the first time on my flight to Concord, NC in October 2004. I took along an old IBM ThinkPad T600X upgraded with a DVD drive to see how the software would work and ATC obliged me by giving me a different approach than I expected. Although I had the "new" approach in the Jepp pack and available, I took the opportunity to test ChartViewer to see how easily and quickly I could find the approach on the laptop. I was pleased to find it took only seconds to find the approach. While the software worked quite well (enough so that I chucked Jepp as soon as my subscription expired), the hardware situation needed some work. On that flight, I was able to put the laptop in "George's" seat since I was the only one in the plane. The flip-top screen of the laptop wasn't a problem in that scenario, but I could tell it would not have worked nearly so well had there been a person sitting in the copilot's seat. The screen of the laptop would have interfered with the yoke or else the copilot would have had to hold the laptop above the controls (obscuring somebody's view, for sure) and there is no way to put it in my lap without it interfering with the yoke. Enter the TabletPC. I've been using a PocketPC in the cockpit for several years now and had a PDA for a couple years before that. I use it for A/FD info as well as a moving map GPS - at least until we got a panel-mounted Garmin installed early in 2005. The point is I'm comfortable with pen-based interfaces and started looking at Tablets for use in the plane. (OK, I was using that as justification for a new toy, but I really *did* plan to use it in the plane. Honest.) I ended up buying the Gateway M275 mainly due to cost and was able to put it to its first test shortly afterward on a flight from Manassas, VA to Manteo, NC (Outer Banks). This model weighs in at a relatively hefty 6 pounds. While that's heavy for a Tablet, you have to remember this is really a convertible laptop with all the amenities one would expect from a laptop including a full-size (at least in laptop terms) keyboard, DVD/CD-RW drive, connection ports, etc. The screen rotates on the hinge 180 degrees to lay down flat again with the LCD facing up over the keyboard. In this configuration, all the input is performed via the "pen" (really a stylus on steroids). My intent here isn't to write a full review of the hardware as much as how I think it fits in the cockpit. With that said, I've become rather enamored with the Tablet concept in general and use it daily at the office, especially for taking notes and using it as a mini-whiteboard - quite handy in software development when we start drawing doodles describing the next Great Feature. I had a full complement of passengers and crew for this flight so space was at a premium. I put the M275 in its Tablet configuration and placed it on the floor between the front seats finding it stood on edge nicely with plenty of room to grab hold of it. The M275 has a rubberized grip on one edge that makes it easy to pick up from this position. Since this was my first flight with the Tablet, I wanted to be sure it wouldn't interfere with the safety of the flight so I used my old trusted pencil and paper for my initial clearance and frequency changes during ascent to cruise flight. Once in cruise mode, I reached down and easily found the Tablet's grip without even looking. While I didn't try it, it looks like the Tablet would even fit in the large map pockets we have in our Skylane. Anyway, I put the Tablet on my lap and fired up Sporty's ChartViewer. The Tablet fit quite nicely under the yoke with plenty of room for significant movement of the controls. Extreme inputs like hard right or left rolls would probably put the yoke in contact with the Tablet but, frankly, if I have to put in that much control input in the kind of flying I do, I've got much larger issues to be concerned with than a busted laptop screen. Using the pen in cruise wasn't a problem and I was quickly able to locate the approaches for Manteo (KMQI). Using the Tablet in portrait mode shows probably 90% of the chart on the screen at once and I only need to scroll the view to see the minimums block at the bottom of the chart. My M275 uses 1024x768 resolution only and I don't know if a higher resolution like that of the Toshiba Tecra M4 would show all of the chart, but I found the text easily readable from my lap without squinting. The screen is readable, but that's not to say all is perfect. One of the things I like about the screen is, like many newer LCDs, it does not have a dull anti-glare shield on the display. My opinion is this makes it easier to eliminate glare because you don't have to move the display angle much to eliminate the light source. However, when the display is flat on your lap under the yoke in the cockpit, one doesn't have the luxury of changing the angle much to remove the large light source otherwise known as the windshield. I found that the readability was improved by turning the display backlight on full bright or by taking off my sunglasses. While I'd rate this Tablet maybe a "3 out of 5" for cockpit readability, other models with transflective displays (similar to my iPAQ hx4700) would probably rate much better. Also, while I'm not enamored with the bright-light readability, I did not find the screen even close to unusable. I discovered another use for the Tablet beyond ChartViewer, too. Like many pilots I know, I have acquired the habit of writing down frequencies immediately after ATC issues me a handoff (usually before I acknowledge the call). Having Windows Journal (or better yet, Microsoft OneNote) up makes it a snap to "write" down the frequencies as they're rattled off. Just like with paper, it's my writing only I can add more writing area by simply scrolling down. I found this feature quite useful when checking weather reports and other minutiae pilots find useful to jot down. This also makes it easier to write down thoughts, notes, etc. for later write-ups or log entries. One possible concern is the pen. As I said before, this is a stylus on steroids with pressure sensitive electronics embedded in it and the Tablet (in Tablet mode) won't accept any input without it. This isn't like the PocketPC with a pressure-sensitive digitizer on the screen. It would not be good to lose the pen in the cockpit. I bought a second pen to have in a handy place for this occurrence, but one could mitigate this risk by tying a small lanyard or affixing a Velcro strip to the pen. It was drilled into me during instrument training that you want to move your head as little as possible while in IMC to help prevent spatial disorientation. Having the Tablet on your lap means you'll have to move your head to see it. How much depends on your vision, but I don't find this to be any more of an issue than looking at my kneeboard to write a clearance or frequency change. My flight to and from KMQI was just about two hours each way and I found the battery on the M275 was able to last the entire flight with a little less than 20% capacity remaining. I was not using ChartViewer in "run from DVD" mode, but rather had all the charts I needed installed on the hard drive. Also, I did not have the backlight on full bright unless I felt I needed it and turned it down to its lowest setting for most of the flight. (Toggling the brightness is easily done by pressing a button on the display until the desired setting appears.) The M275 draws less than 3.2 amps of 19 volt DC power and comes with a 60 Watt power supply that shouldn't be much of an issue for the typical 12 volt power outlet (using an inverter, obviously). There are after-market power supplies available that work directly from the "cigar lighter", too. In summary, I find the Tablet form factor to be rather useful for pilots. The size is large enough to have a readable screen (mine has a 14" display) without being bulky or unwieldy in the confined space of the cockpit. Fliers of stick-controlled planes like the Diamond Eclipse may find a need for a Velcro strap to keep the Tablet positioned on one leg, but most pilots would likely find it fits just fine in the plane. Readability for this model isn't as good as, say, my iPAQ screen, but it is usable and the "endless sheet of paper" it offers is enticing. Not to mention its ability to play music or other in-flight entertainment... -- John T http://tknowlogy.com/TknoFlyer http://www.pocketgear.com/products_s...veloperid=4415 Reduce spam. Use Sender Policy Framework: http://spf.pobox.com ____________________ |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
PIREP: WxWorx w/Bluetooth | Nathan Young | Piloting | 5 | June 21st 05 07:50 PM |
Diamond DA-40 with G-1000 pirep | C J Campbell | Instrument Flight Rules | 117 | July 22nd 04 05:40 PM |
Diamond DA-40 with G-1000 pirep | C J Campbell | Owning | 114 | July 22nd 04 05:40 PM |
Antonov vs Galaxy cockpit | Emilio | Military Aviation | 13 | July 2nd 04 06:15 AM |
Suggestions for cockpit tablet PC | Nathan Young | Piloting | 3 | April 8th 04 04:48 AM |