![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Doofus P. Leadbottom wrote:
I've got somewhat of a liking for Ercoupes and its derivitives. They seem to be inexpensive to purchase, and somewhat cheap to fly and maintain. For a fairly new pilot, who just want to fly for the fun of it, are they a good bet? I had been fascinated with these for a long time and eventually I found a kind owner who took let me fly in his, with him in the right seat. It was a 415CD with the 90HP engine installed. No rudder pedals. It was a blast for buzzing around the pattern but it did have its drawbacks. The rudderless design meant a few quirks. For example taking off and landing with a left crosswind was, ummm, interesting. The plane wants to weathervane into the wind, plus despite a design that was supposed to eliminate it, it has a left turning tendency so you have to steer right when the crosswind is left, which raises the upwind wing which can be disconcerting on takeoff and landing roll though I think you would get used to it. Right after liftoff or right before touchdown you can find yourself banking pretty steeply right to stay straight down the runway in a left crosswind. Yikes. In a right crosswind the left-turning tendency seemed to counteract the weathervaning tendency so it was much more comfortable. Also flying in the bumps was kind of sloppy because if you raise a wing that turbulence has lowered, you also yaw that way, so you do a lot of wallowing. I've heard flying in turbulence in one of these described as "shepherding it in the correct general direction". On the plus side, the plane is uber cool, you never worry about spins, and there's nothing like flying around on a warm day with the top open. For me at 6'2" with a headset it would not be comfortable at all with the top closed, but the one I flew had a 152 seat installed that the owner said was taller than normal (he is a shorter guy). 'coupes have limited capability, but an honest look at my logbook shows that it's plenty of plane for probably 80% of the flying I actually do that isn't instrument training. I'm working on my instrument now so I'm getting used to planes with more capability but if I had the money I would consider buying one for use as a nice-day knockabout. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Opinions wanted | ArtKramr | Military Aviation | 65 | January 21st 04 04:15 AM |
OPINIONS: THE SOLUTION | ArtKramr | Military Aviation | 4 | January 7th 04 10:43 PM |
Rallye/Koliber AD's and opinions | R. Wubben | Owning | 2 | October 16th 03 05:39 AM |
Rallye/Koliber AD's and opinions | R. Wubben | Piloting | 2 | October 16th 03 05:39 AM |
What do you think about ercoupe | ianf | Owning | 9 | August 27th 03 11:48 PM |