A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Mooney 201 prop



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #9  
Old August 22nd 05, 08:16 PM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Mon, 22 Aug 2005 07:52:01 -0600, Newps wrote:

George Patterson wrote:
Later in the war, the
Thunderbolt was re-equipped with a prop which had comparatively wide
blades -- the pilots called it a "paddle-blade" prop. Rate-of-climb and
maneuverability immediately improved to the point that a good Jug pilot
could out-maneuver a Spitfire.


How does a prop change make the plane more manuverable?


That depends on the pilot. This story likely came from Robert Johnson
who was the pilot who "wrote" the book "Thunderbolt" with Martin
Caidin. Johnson was apparently a natural at flying fighters and
intuitively understood how to get the most from his mount and how to
best maneuver it for a successful attack. He was one of the first to
use the vertical for combat maneuvering rather than just banking and
yanking and holding your breath.

While Caidin has often been accused of not letting the facts get in
the way of a good yarn, Johnson's prowess in the vertical was also
described in the fighters bible on Air Combat Maneuvering. That may
not be the exact title, but it was a book written by a fighter pilot,
for fighter pilots, and described various methods for getting your
target aircraft in front of you by maneuvering.

Johnson did not have the benefit of that kind of training or insight,
he just learned how to do it by experience. He naturally used the
Thunderbolt's best assets which he thought was it's rapid rate of
roll, it's incredible dive and it's ability to zoom climb.

When he encountered an enemy fighter that normally could out turn him
in a normal horizontal turn and attempted to do so, he'd pull back the
stick and go vertical, rotating around so that he had the enemy
fighter in his vision as he went up. Now the enemy fighter was
basically trapped. No matter what it did, turn right, turn left or
attempt to dive away, Johnson would roll so that his canopy was
towards it and pull the stick back and pull the nose down on it. The
dive then took over and within seconds the enemy aircraft was in his
sights. Only climbing vertically with him would have offered some
protection, but few German fighter pilots knew to do that.

Johnson also described some mock dogfights he had with two Spitfires,
both before he got the paddle blade prop installed, and after. He
claimed that after the prop was installed, he was able to climb away
from the Spitfire, whereas prior to it's installation the Spitfire
readily outclimbed him, although he did not describe what type he was
flying against. That would have made a difference.

With the paddle blade prop, he basically started out with a drag race,
which the P-47 won by pulling ahead, then used the rapid roll rate,
which the Spitfire could not match to roll rapidly in one direction,
then roll rapidly in the other, while the Spitfire got further and
further behind as he tried to follow. A quick dive gave Johnson a lot
of momentum and then he went vertical and pulled back down on the
Spitfire. The hapless Spitfire pilot was then faced with a canopy
full of snarling engine and 8 machine guns.

Johnson doesn't state this, but the paddle blade prop was accompanied
by water injection, which added quite a boost in engine performance.
without that added power, it isn't clear that the P-47 would have been
able to make use of the wider cord blades. Johnson apparently also
had no problem using water injection when he wanted it. It was war,
and engines were swapped out regularly for shipment back to the states
for overhauling.

Corky Scott
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Right prop, wrong prop? Wood prop, metal prop? Gus Rasch Aerobatics 1 February 14th 08 10:18 PM
Ivo Prop on O-320 Dave S Home Built 14 October 15th 04 03:04 AM
IVO props... comments.. Dave S Home Built 16 December 6th 03 11:43 PM
Metal Prop vs. Wood Prop Larry Smith Home Built 21 September 26th 03 07:45 PM
New Prop on my Mooney Ovation Charles Talleyrand Owning 1 July 7th 03 10:30 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:51 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.