![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have always been under the impression that lift is the product of
airspeed and angle of attack, and that lift is the measure of upward force acting on the plane at a given time. For instance, if you are doing slow flight, your wings are producing the same amount of life that you would be if you were cruising, GIVEN that you did not lose or gain any altitude during the maneuver. My instructor, which is a very knowledgable guy tried telling me that lift has nothing to do with airspeed. He said that lift is directly and soley related to AOA and AOA only. So if you are doing slow flight, you are producing more life than you are when you're cruising. I overheard a ATP guy who flies King Air's say that this huge 20 ton military plane he used to fly would fly approaches at 110 knots, and I heard him say "It is able to do this because it producing so much lift", which I took as him defining lift as my instructor does. So whats the deal here? Are we just thinking of two diffrent concepts? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Lift Query | Avril Poisson | General Aviation | 8 | April 21st 05 07:50 PM |
Tamed by the Tailwheel | [email protected] | Piloting | 84 | January 18th 05 04:08 PM |
New theory of flight released Sept 2004 | Mark Oliver | Piloting | 70 | October 10th 04 10:50 PM |
Lift and Angle of Attack | Peter Duniho | Simulators | 9 | October 2nd 03 10:55 PM |
Across Nevada and Part Way Back (long) | Marry Daniel or David Grah | Soaring | 18 | July 30th 03 08:52 PM |