![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
For you instrument installation experts out there, I'd like to pick
your brain if you have a circular tuit. My new glider (a Ventus 2C) came with a Sage (model CV) vario, Winter ASI and altimeter, and nothing else that connects to pressure sources. Last week a Cambridge 302 and a new LX7000 were installed. When the new hardware was installed, all the tubing was replaced except for the one from the capacity bottle (behind the pilot seat) to the Sage, which is also connected to static pressure. No restrictor was installed in the latter. The C-302 and LX7000 were both installed on the TE source and configured internally for TE (not electronic) compensation, so at the time of my first flight Saturday, those were the only two instruments connected to the TE probe. The Sage was virtually useless during my two flights on Saturday (my first in the glider). It swung wildly and rapidly in all directions. The 302 and the LX seemed to work fine. A fellow pilot suggested that I add a restrictor in the form of a cigarette filter to the Sage's pressure source. The result yesterday was very calm needle, maybe too calm (some of the filter will be removed). But I still found its reading to be quite different from the 302's. Some to be expected, of course, since the Sage was on static source while the 302 was on the TE. On light pull-ups, the stick thermals were 10 to 15 knots! Anyway, all that's background. I want to switch the Sage from static to TE pressure source so it acts more like the B-40 of my previous glider (which was on the TE). But I have been warned not to put more than one or two instruments on the TE pressure source, because they have a certain amount of built-in "leak" or "loss" as part of the PFM they do. That is what I would like feedback on - if it's really inadvisable to put 3 or more instruments on the TE. If it's a Bad Thing, my plan will be to move the C-302 from TE to electronic compensation, and leave the LX7000 with the Sage on the TE. Any thoughts on this too? ... or should I put the LX7000 on electronic compensation too and leave the Sage alone on TE? Advance thanks -ted/2NO |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Electronic versus Pneumatic compensation (follow-up) | [email protected] | Soaring | 4 | September 20th 05 06:21 PM |
Electronic versus Pneumatic compensation in LX7000 | [email protected] | Soaring | 8 | September 15th 05 02:49 AM |
Stars and Stripes Offers Free Electronic Newspaper, By Sgt. 1st Class Doug Sample, USA | Otis Willie | Naval Aviation | 0 | April 30th 04 09:45 PM |
Stars and Stripes Offers Free Electronic Newspaper, By Sgt. 1st Class Doug Sample, USA | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | April 30th 04 09:45 PM |