![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]() On 19-Nov-2005, Mike Spera wrote: For those who give advice like "just do it", remember, the jury is forever "out" whenever you yourself do such a thing. At any time, some A&P or FAA inspector on the ramp may tap YOU on the shoulder and say "I don't think so" to the very operation you are recommending to others. Yes, the likelihood of someone KNOWING about some of this stuff may be quite slim. But, we have all read the horror stories of what happens when someone is forced to get a "new" mechanic ("hey, nice interior plastic, where's the paperwork?????"). Remember Jay's wing tip strobe "adventure". I think that some common sense is in order here. Remember, the intent of the regs with respect to maintenance is flight safety, not creating a "gotcha" situation. The fact is, application of the rules regarding preventative maintenance (which can be performed by the pilot/owner) leave quite a bit of room for interpretation. Patch a hole in seat upholstery? Sure, no problem. Completely recover the seat? It seems like that would be allowed as "replacing seat parts" but you have to use parts "approved for the aircraft" whatever that is. On the other hand, one could argue that recovering a seat is "repairing upholstery" which is allowed without mention of using approved parts. My take on repair, painting, or even replacement of simple interior plastic pieces is that this falls under the category of "repair" of "decorative furnishings" even if the components in question are involved in cabin ventilation. My thinking is that such maintenance is far less likely to impinge upon safety than, say, performing an oil change, which is certainly allowed. I would hazard a guess that if some anal retentive FAA examiner wanted to, he/she could find at least one maintenance violation in just about any privately owned airplane that is more than a few years old. Here's an example from our Arrow: It came from the factory equipped with cloth curtains that could be used by rear seat passengers to shade the sun. They really don't work very well and are generally a pain in the butt, so we simply removed them. Now, since they comprise maybe a total of two ounces of the "official" empty weight and are part of the airplane as certified, and since there is no mention in the POH that they can be removed if desired, strictly speaking they have to be there for legal flight. My guess is that if we ever get a ramp check we will be given a pass on this one. -- -Elliott Drucker |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|