![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It doesn't matter if the airspace around the airport is class C or B it only
matters if the requriements for the approach are met. Usually the hangup is centerline lighting which is expensive to add. I'm sure that the airports with frequent low weather are more likely to have the centerline lighting although many airports in the PNW, including KBFI, do not have it.. I suspect that there is an element of politics in who gets the money. Mike MU-2 "Peter R." wrote in message ... Mike Rapoport wrote: Most Cat II and III approaches are at major airports. One of the requirements is that the runway must have centerline lighting which is generally only found at the largest airports. Could the presence of a CAT II or III approach also be a function of a greater occurrence of low visibility? My home airport, Syracuse (KSYR), has a CAT II ILS, yet it is only a class C airport. During the winter we experience heavy lake effect snow bands off Lake Ontario and I had suspected that this was the reason for a CAT II ILS rather than its size. -- Peter |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|